{"id":18370,"date":"2026-04-16T14:37:11","date_gmt":"2026-04-16T13:37:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/solent-avocats.com\/guides\/droit-commercial\/concurrence-deloyale\/"},"modified":"2026-04-16T14:37:13","modified_gmt":"2026-04-16T13:37:13","slug":"unfair-competition","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/solent-avocats.com\/en\/guides\/droit-commercial\/concurrence-deloyale\/","title":{"rendered":"Unfair competition"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2 id=\"definition\">Definition: three conditions, one basis<\/h2>\n<p>French law does not have a specific text listing the types of behaviour that constitute unfair competition. It is a praetorian construction: the courts determine on a case-by-case basis whether behaviour crosses the line. The reference text is the\u2019<strong>article 1240 of the Civil Code<\/strong> This is supplemented by article 1241, which imposes liability for simple imprudence or negligence. Supplemented by article 1241, which imposes liability for simple imprudence or negligence, this basis means that a fault of unfair competition does not require the intention to harm. An entrepreneur who launches a product without checking that it does not create confusion with an existing competitor may be held liable, even if he had no intention to cause harm.<\/p>\n<p>An action for unfair competition presupposes that three cumulative conditions have been met: a <strong>fault<\/strong> (behaviour contrary to fair trade practices), a <strong>damage<\/strong> (material, commercial or moral) and a <strong>causal link<\/strong> between the two. These three conditions must be proved by the plaintiff - except in the case of denigration, where the Cour de cassation now presumes prejudice (see next section).<\/p>\n<h3>Freedom of competition and its limits<\/h3>\n<p>The freedom of trade and industry, inherited from the d'Allarde decree of 2-17 March 1791 and recognised by the Constitutional Council, authorises everyone to seek to attract the customers of their competitors. No-one owns their customers outright. Losing them to a more efficient or cheaper rival is not a fault.<\/p>\n<p>There is a limit to this freedom: fairness. Competition must conform to honest commercial practices. Without this requirement, companies would be reluctant to invest or innovate, since their efforts could be copied or discredited with impunity. It is to preserve a fair business environment that the law sanctions behaviour that goes beyond the bounds of normal competition. The dividing line is never absolute - it depends on the sector, the nature of the practices and the degree of proximity between companies.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"encadre\">\n<div class=\"encadre-title\">Reference text<\/div>\n<p>Article 1240 of the Civil Code: \u00abAny act of man whatsoever which causes damage to another person obliges the person by whose fault it occurred to make reparation for it\u00bb. Intention to cause harm is not a condition. Simple negligence is sufficient (art. 1241 C. civ.).<\/p>\n<\/aside>\n<h2 id=\"formes\">The four forms of unfair competition<\/h2>\n<p>Case law has identified four main categories of unfair behaviour. This classification is not exhaustive - any behaviour that is contrary to commercial loyalty may be qualified as misconduct - but it constitutes the analytical grid used by the courts.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"confusion\">Confusion: creating the risk of misunderstanding<\/h3>\n<p>Confusion consists of creating, in the mind of the customer, a <strong>risk of misunderstanding<\/strong> between two companies and their products or services. The aim, whether conscious or not, is to capture a competitor's customers by making them believe that you are the competitor or that you offer the same products.<\/p>\n<p>The methods used are varied: imitation of a trade name, use of characteristic visual elements (logo, graphic charter, presentation of a website), similar packaging, use of a similar domain name. The assessment is made globally, taking into account all the elements used and the overall impression given to the average consumer.<\/p>\n<p>The Court of Cassation confirmed this in a ruling dated 4 June 2025: the judge must consider whether the use of elements, taken as a whole, was likely to create a risk of confusion in the mind of the public. Repetitions of elements which, even if not protectable in isolation, create a misleading overall impression (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/juri\/id\/JURITEXT000052270568\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Cass. com. 4 June 2025, no. 24-10.219<\/a>). The <strong>simple risk of confusion is enough<\/strong> It is not necessary to show that the misunderstanding actually occurred.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"denigrement\">Denigration: bringing discredit<\/h3>\n<p>Denigration consists of disseminating information that is likely to discredit the products, services or achievements of an identifiable competitor, regardless of whether this information is true or false.<\/p>\n<p>Four elements characterise sanctionable denigration. From <strong>critical or negative comments<\/strong>, Firstly, aimed at the company, its management or its products - regardless of whether the criticism is well-founded. A <strong>advertising<\/strong> secondly: the comments must be disseminated beyond a restricted private circle, regardless of the medium (social networks, customer circulars, trade fairs, verbal comments). L\u2019<strong>target identification<\/strong> The target competitor must be identifiable, even if not named by name. Finally, a <strong>wrongful nature<\/strong> Excessive or tendentious comments, or comments aimed primarily at causing harm rather than providing objective information.<\/p>\n<p>The argument \u00abbut it's true!\u00bb is not enough to escape classification. Unlike defamation, which protects the honour of a natural person, commercial denigration can be constituted even if the information disseminated is accurate, as long as it is presented in a tendentious manner or with the aim of causing harm.<\/p>\n<p>In a ruling handed down on 26 June 2024, the French Supreme Court considerably lowered the threshold for proving prejudice: the disclosure, even to a single customer, of information likely to discredit a competitor's products constitutes denigration. Damage - even if only non-material - can now be inferred from <strong>necessarily<\/strong> of such an act, without the victim having to prove it (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/juri\/id\/JURITEXT000049856080\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Cass. com. 26 June 2024, no. 23-11.020<\/a>).<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"desorganisation\">Disorganisation: disrupting the competitor<\/h3>\n<p>Disorganisation refers to acts that disrupt the internal workings of a competitor or, more broadly, the market itself. It takes two main forms.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Recruiting staff<\/strong> is the most common. Hiring an employee from a competitor is not, in itself, unfair - freedom of employment allows it. However, poaching becomes wrongful when it is accompanied by unfair practices: systematic and targeted solicitation of key employees, offers accompanied by requests to divulge business secrets, mass recruitment designed to paralyse the competitor's business. The Cour de cassation ruled that the poaching of 11 out of 22 employees constituted wrongful mass poaching, even when the employees had been released from their non-competition undertaking (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/juri\/id\/JURITEXT000047537768\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Cass. com. 13 April 2023, no. 22-12.808<\/a>). A few months later, the Court clarified that the victim's previous economic difficulties do not preclude compensation for damage caused by wrongful dismissal (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/juri\/id\/JURITEXT000050756862\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Cass. com. 4 December 2024, no. 23-14.137<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Misappropriation of confidential information<\/strong> constitutes a second form of disorganisation. The Court of Cassation has ruled that the possession or appropriation of confidential information belonging to a competitor company, brought in by a former employee - even one not bound by a non-competition clause - constitutes an act of unfair competition (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/juri\/id\/JURITEXT000047626570\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Cass. com. 17 May 2023, no. 22-16.031<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>Disorganisation can also result from <strong>breach of regulations<\/strong> These include the illegal practice of a regulated profession, failure to comply with health or environmental standards, and systematic loss-making reselling. A company that ignores the rules respected by its competitors gains an unfair advantage that distorts competition. Such non-compliance is in itself a fault if it gives the company a competitive advantage.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"parasitisme\">Economic parasitism: profiting from the efforts of others<\/h3>\n<p>Economic parasitism refers to behaviour whereby an operator follows in the footsteps of another in order to take undue advantage of the latter's efforts, know-how, reputation or investments, without having to finance them.<\/p>\n<p>The Court of Cassation clarified this definition in a sectional judgment of 26 June 2024: parasitism is a form of unfairness within the meaning of article 1240 of the Civil Code, and the victim must <strong>identify individualised economic value<\/strong> that it invokes - know-how, reputation, creative investment whose fruits have been appropriated by the parasite (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/juri\/id\/JURITEXT000049856084\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Cass. com. 26 June 2024, no. 22-17.647<\/a>). In a decision handed down on the same day, the Court specified that this value cannot be deduced solely from the longevity and marketing success of a product, as ideas are free to evolve: adopting a concept by adapting it does not in itself constitute parasitism (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/juri\/id\/JURITEXT000049856076\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Cass. com. 26 June 2024, no. 23-13.535<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>A judgment of 5 March 2025 confirmed this line: the use of the same materials to follow current trends is not sufficient to characterise the desire to follow in the footsteps of others (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/juri\/id\/JURITEXT000051568186\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Cass. com., 5 March 2025, no. 23-21.157<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>A distinctive feature of parasitism is that it does not require a competitive relationship between the parties. An economic operator may be guilty of parasitic conduct towards a company operating in a completely different sector. This is the classic distinction between parasitic competition (between competitors) and parasitic acts (between non-competitors).<\/p>\n<aside class=\"encadre\">\n<div class=\"encadre-title\">Not to be confused - Parasitism and imitation<\/div>\n<p>Not all imitation is parasitism. Ideas, market trends and generic techniques are freely available. Parasitism presupposes the appropriation of an individualised economic value - a specific investment, an acquired reputation, identified know-how. Without this demonstration, the application will be rejected.<\/p>\n<\/aside>\n<h2 id=\"preuve\">Proving unfair competition<\/h2>\n<p>There is often a gap between believing you are a victim and being able to prove it in court. The action is based on three cumulative conditions - fault, prejudice, causal link - and each must be established.<\/p>\n<h3>Fault and how to prove it<\/h3>\n<p>Fault is assessed on a case-by-case basis, taking into account industry practice, the degree of proximity between the companies, the nature of the practices in question and whether they are systematic or isolated. The four standard categories are not exhaustive.<\/p>\n<p>The methods of proof available deserve particular attention. The <strong>court commissioner's reports<\/strong> can be used to \u00abphotograph\u00bb a situation at a given moment: denigrating advertising on a website, a confusing shop layout, the sale of imitation products. These observations have a strong evidential value. Visit <strong>testimonials and certificates<\/strong> from misled customers or former employees can be useful, provided they are obtained fairly. Visit <strong>written documents<\/strong> - advertising, brochures, e-mails, time-stamped screenshots - are particularly volatile digital evidence, and it is vital that they are stored quickly.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, and this is often the most effective way, the <strong>measures of inquiry in futurum<\/strong> provided for in the\u2019<strong>Article 145 of the Code of Civil Procedure<\/strong>. If you suspect unfair trading but lack direct evidence, you can ask the judge - even before initiating proceedings on the merits - to order precautionary measures to obtain it: appointing an expert, having a court commissioner visit the competitor's premises, seizing computer documents. There must be a legitimate reason (serious and plausible suspicions) and the measure must be proportionate. In urgent cases, the application may be made by petition, without prior adversarial debate.<\/p>\n<h3>Damage: three categories to be distinguished<\/h3>\n<p>Proving fault is not enough. Three categories of loss must be distinguished.<\/p>\n<p>Le <strong>direct material damage<\/strong> is the most obvious: loss of sales, reduced margins, loss of contracts directly attributable to unfair behaviour. This is often the easiest to quantify, but not always the most important in a case of denigration or parasitism.<\/p>\n<p>Le <strong>commercial disturbance<\/strong> encompasses more diffuse damage: damage to brand image, trivialisation of products, internal disorganisation of the victim company, loss of opportunity. It is admissible even in the absence of a quantifiable loss of turnover.<\/p>\n<p>Le <strong>moral damage<\/strong>, Finally, the Court of Cassation regularly confirms that legal persons are entitled to claim damages. In a denigration case, it is even irrebuttably presumed: no specific proof is required (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/juri\/id\/JURITEXT000049856080\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Cass. com. 26 June 2024, no. 23-11.020<\/a>).<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"action\">Taking legal action: unfair competition proceedings<\/h2>\n<h3>Which jurisdiction should I take?<\/h3>\n<p>Le <strong>commercial court<\/strong> has jurisdiction over disputes between merchants, pursuant to article L. 721-3 of the French Commercial Code. If one of the parties is not a trader, the <strong>judicial tribunal<\/strong> has jurisdiction. It also has jurisdiction where the unfair competition action is related to an infringement action, as the latter is dealt with by a specialised court.<\/p>\n<p>The industrial tribunal, which is often cited incorrectly, only has jurisdiction over disputes arising from the employment contract (employee's duty of loyalty, breach of a non-competition clause by the employee himself). It cannot hear unfair competition claims brought by a company against a competitor.<\/p>\n<p>For territorial jurisdiction, Article 46 of the Code of Civil Procedure offers a choice between the court of the defendant's domicile, the court of the place where the damage occurred or the court of the place where the damage was suffered.<\/p>\n<h3>Emergency and precautionary measures<\/h3>\n<p>In the event of manifest unfairness, the victim may refer the matter to the <strong>interim relief judge<\/strong> to obtain the immediate cessation of the conduct, without waiting for the outcome of the trial on the merits. Urgency and the absence of a serious dispute (or the existence of a manifestly unlawful disturbance) are the conditions required. A conviction under <strong>on-call duty<\/strong> can be issued, giving the injunction real coercive force.<\/p>\n<p>Article 145 of the Code of Civil Procedure (already mentioned) makes it possible to secure evidence even before summoning. This measure is often preferable to a premature writ of summons, which is likely to fail for lack of evidence.<\/p>\n<h3>The statute of limitations: five years<\/h3>\n<p>The limitation period for an action for unfair competition is <strong>five years<\/strong> from the day on which the victim knew or should have known of the facts giving rise to the claim (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000019017112\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">article 2224 of the Civil Code<\/a>). This period begins as soon as the initial facts come to light, even if the unfair acts continue over time. It is not a continuous offence. Vigilance is essential: a company that allows the time limit to elapse without taking action is definitively deprived of its right of action, even if the acts have continued.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"sanctions\">Penalties and redress<\/h2>\n<p>If the action is well-founded, it will result in three types of conviction.<\/p>\n<p>The <strong>damages<\/strong> is the penalty in principle. The court awards full compensation for the loss: material loss (loss of turnover, lost contracts), commercial disruption (damage to image) and non-material loss. In a ruling dated 9 April 2025, the Court of Cassation stated that moral prejudice is irrebuttably presumed in cases of unfair competition, and that the judge may use the undue advantage method to assess it - in other words, make the amount of damages correspond to the profit made by the perpetrator of the unfair conduct (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/juri\/id\/JURITEXT000051770142\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Cass. com. 9 April 2025, no. 23-22.122<\/a>). This is a significant development: it makes it possible to award substantial compensation even when the direct loss is difficult to quantify.<\/p>\n<p>The <strong>injunctions to cease unfair practices under penalty payment<\/strong> are not only a means of obtaining reparation for the past, but also a guarantee for the future. Any breach of this provision exposes the convicted party to an additional penalty equal to the amount of the fine imposed.<\/p>\n<p>La <strong>publication of the judgment<\/strong>, Publication in newspapers or trade journals, at the expense of the offender, is an additional sanction that is particularly effective when damage to reputation is the main component of the loss. The court determines the methods and media used.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"encadre\">\n<div class=\"encadre-title\">Good to know - The undue advantage method<\/div>\n<p>Since the judgment of 9 April 2025 (no. 23-22.122), the courts have been able to set damages at the level of the profit made by the perpetrator of the unfair conduct. This method is particularly useful when the victim has difficulty quantifying his own loss but can demonstrate the gain made by the unfair competitor.<\/p>\n<\/aside>\n<h2 id=\"contrefacon\">Unfair competition and counterfeiting: not to be confused<\/h2>\n<p>La <strong>counterfeiting<\/strong> infringes an intellectual property right - trademark, patent, registered design or copyright. It requires the existence of a valid and enforceable title. The <strong>unfair competition<\/strong> sanctions a fault in the exercise of competition, independently of any intellectual property protection. It is available to companies that have not taken care to register their distinctive signs.<\/p>\n<p>The two actions may be combined in the same proceedings - and they frequently are, particularly in matters of confusion. However, the Cour de cassation requires that the two claims be based on <strong>separate facts<\/strong> It is not possible to accuse someone of doing exactly the same thing under two different headings. If the facts on which the unfair competition action is based are identical to those on which the infringement action is based, the additional claim will be rejected (Cass. com., 23 June 2021, no. 19-18.111).<\/p>\n<p>In practice, this means that the infringement action will relate to the slavish reproduction of a protected trademark or design, while the unfair competition action may relate to unprotected elements - the trade name, the general graphic charter, the trade dress - provided that their use creates a misleading overall impression. Visit <a href=\"\/en\/commercial-lawyer\/\">page on the firm's expertise in commercial law<\/a> sets out the terms and conditions of the firm's involvement in these cases.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Votre concurrent imite votre site, d\u00e9bauche vos collaborateurs cl\u00e9s ou d\u00e9nigre vos produits aupr\u00e8s de vos clients. Vous suspectez une concurrence d\u00e9loyale \u2014 mais entre l&rsquo;intuition et l&rsquo;action en justice, le chemin est plus technique qu&rsquo;il n&rsquo;y para\u00eet. Ce guide expose les quatre formes que reconna\u00eet la jurisprudence, les r\u00e8gles de preuve, les juridictions comp\u00e9tentes et les sanctions disponibles, \u00e0 la lumi\u00e8re des arr\u00eats de la Cour de cassation les plus r\u00e9cents.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"parent":18290,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"page-templates\/template-guide-enfant.php","meta":{"footnotes":""},"solent_domaine":[443,412],"class_list":["post-18370","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/solent-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18370","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/solent-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/solent-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/solent-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18370"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/solent-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18370\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18371,"href":"https:\/\/solent-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18370\/revisions\/18371"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/solent-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18290"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/solent-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18370"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"solent_domaine","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/solent-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/solent_domaine?post=18370"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}