{"id":18376,"date":"2026-04-16T14:37:28","date_gmt":"2026-04-16T13:37:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/solent-avocats.com\/guides\/droit-commercial\/fonds-de-commerce\/"},"modified":"2026-04-16T14:37:30","modified_gmt":"2026-04-16T13:37:30","slug":"business-capital","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/solent-avocats.com\/en\/guides\/droit-commercial\/fonds-de-commerce\/","title":{"rendered":"The business"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Buying a business, selling it, pledging it to a bank: these three operations are at the heart of commercial life, and they require an understanding of a concept that the legislator has never taken care to define. The Commercial Code, in Title IV devoted to business assets, organises the transfer, pledging and management lease of business assets without ever providing a definition. For more than a century, it has been case law that has defined the contours of the concept - and two major reforms, in 2019 and 2021, have renewed the regime.<\/p>\n<p>This guide sets out the business as it is practised in 2026: what it contains, what it excludes, how it is sold and how it is pledged. The angle taken is that of a practising lawyer. Less the academic definition than the practical pitfalls: what the abolition of the former article L. 141-1 changes for the seller, what the 2021 reform changes for the pledgee, and why the non-competition clause remains a minefield.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"definition\">What is goodwill?<\/h2>\n<h3>A concept without legal definition<\/h3>\n<p>The absence of a legal definition is not an oversight: it is a tradition. Neither the Commercial Code nor the Civil Code defines goodwill. The Reform Commission did sketch out a formulation: \u00abA business consists of the movable assets allocated to the exercise of commercial activities. It must include a customer base\u00bb. It was never codified.<\/p>\n<p>Case law has filled the gap. Since a seminal ruling by the Chambre des requ\u00eates of <strong>15 February 1937<\/strong>, This definition, which has been adopted and refined over the decades, remains the benchmark today. This definition, adopted and refined over the decades, remains the benchmark today.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"encadre\">\n<div class=\"encadre-title\">Jurisprudential definition of goodwill<\/div>\n<p>A set of tangible and intangible movable assets allocated to the operation of a commercial activity, which must include a customer base. The customer base constitutes \u00abthe necessary cement between the other categories of property and gives the business both its legal originality and its economic value\u00bb (Hamel, Lagarde et Jauffret, Trait\u00e9 de droit commercial, t. 2, 1966, Dalloz, no. 1010). Source: Req. 15 Feb 1937, DP 1938. 1. 13.<\/p>\n<\/aside>\n<h3>Customers, the cornerstone of the fund<\/h3>\n<p>The only truly essential element is the customer base. Without a real, specific and independent customer base, there is no business. Case law has stated this unambiguously since 1937: \u00abas soon as an assignment, pledge or management lease involves a customer base, there is an assignment, pledge or management lease of a business\u00bb; conversely, if there is no customer base transferred, there is no business.<\/p>\n<p>Three characters are required. The customer must be <strong>real<\/strong> - a potential customer base is not enough. It must be <strong>own<\/strong> - it belongs to the retailer, not to the owner of the premises or to a distribution network. It must be <strong>autonomous<\/strong> - This excludes, in particular, the manager of a service station whose clientele is pre-constituted by the oil company (Cass. com., 27 Feb. 1973). A tenant who cannot demonstrate the existence of his own independent customer base cannot claim the benefit of the commercial leases statute, nor can he claim compensation for eviction.<\/p>\n<p>From this point of view, the distinction between customers and goodwill is a useful one. Goodwill refers to the flow of customers linked to the location itself - the frequentation of a shopping mall, the passage of a busy crossroads. It is linked to the premises, not the retailer. Customers, on the other hand, are attached to the operator: it is he who has created them and built up their loyalty. The Paris Court has clearly stated that \u00abthe customer base is an essential element of the business that goodwill cannot replace\u00bb (Paris, 9 June 1987, D. 1987. IR 163).<\/p>\n<h3>Intangible elements of the business<\/h3>\n<p>The customer base is surrounded by the other intangible elements referred to in article L. 141-5, paragraph 2 of the French Commercial Code. The <strong>leasehold rights<\/strong> is in practice the most valuable: it gives the operator the right to occupy the commercial premises and, at the end of the lease, the right to renew it. In some locations, its value can exceed that of all the other elements combined. The <strong>trading name<\/strong> refers to the name under which the business is operated and known to the public. L\u2019<strong>sign<\/strong> is the visible distinctive sign - the panel, the logo, the name displayed on the shop front. Visit <strong>intellectual property rights<\/strong> (trademarks, patents, software, designs and models) form part of the fund when they are assigned to its operation. The <strong>transferable administrative authorisations<\/strong> - These include liquor licences and certain business permits, insofar as they are attached to the business and not to the person operating it.<\/p>\n<h3>Tangible items, and what is not part of the goodwill<\/h3>\n<p>Body parts are easier to identify. The <strong>machinery and equipment<\/strong>the <strong>furniture<\/strong>the <strong>goods and inventories<\/strong> are part of the business. Their role in the sale must be expressly stated in the deed - are they included in the overall price or are they valued separately?<\/p>\n<p>What is not in the fund deserves to be made clear. The <strong>property rights<\/strong> are excluded: a retailer who owns his premises does not sell his building when he sells his business. The <strong>receivables and payables<\/strong> They remain the assets of the transferor, unless otherwise agreed. The <strong>contracts<\/strong> related to the operation (suppliers, customers, distribution, maintenance) are not automatically transferred to the purchaser: either a special legal provision is required - such as Article L. 1224-1 of the French Labour Code for employment contracts, or the specific rules for commercial leases - or the express agreement of all three parties (transferor, transferee, co-contractor).<\/p>\n<table style=\"width:100%; border-collapse:collapse; margin:1.5rem 0; font-family:var(--font-heading); font-size:0.875rem;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"background:var(--color-primary); color:#fff;\">\n<th style=\"padding:10px 14px; text-align:left;\">Included in the fund<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px 14px; text-align:left;\">Excluded (in principle)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid var(--color-border);\">\n<td style=\"padding:10px 14px;\">Customers and goodwill<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 14px;\">Property rights (ownership of premises)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid var(--color-border); background:#fafafa;\">\n<td style=\"padding:10px 14px;\">Right to lease<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 14px;\">Debts and receivables<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid var(--color-border);\">\n<td style=\"padding:10px 14px;\">Trade name, sign<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 14px;\">Contracts (with legal exceptions)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid var(--color-border); background:#fafafa;\">\n<td style=\"padding:10px 14px;\">Intellectual property rights (trademarks, patents, software)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 14px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid var(--color-border);\">\n<td style=\"padding:10px 14px;\">Transferable administrative authorisations<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 14px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"background:#fafafa;\">\n<td style=\"padding:10px 14px;\">Equipment, furniture, merchandise<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 14px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2 id=\"nature\">Legal nature: intangible personal property<\/h2>\n<p>A business is a <strong>intangible furniture<\/strong>. This has been the case since the end of the 19th century.<sup>e<\/sup> century (Req., 13 March 1888): because the fonds consists only of movable items and because all universality is movable, it falls under the regime of movable property. This has important practical consequences. The pledge of a business is similar to a mortgage, but it is a movable security subject to specific rules - registration with the commercial court registry, not with the land registry.<\/p>\n<p>Nor is the fund an autonomous special purpose vehicle. It has no legal personality. Debts and receivables arising from the business remain with the operator - they do not form part of the business. The sale of the business does not therefore transfer them.<\/p>\n<p>The Court of Cassation has laid this down unambiguously: \u00abin the case of a transfer of a business, the purchaser does not take over the debts or receivables of the transferor, unless the deed of sale expressly provides for this\u00bb (Cass. com, <strong>7 July 2009<\/strong>, n\u00b0 05-21322). This is one of the structural advantages of the purchase of a business as opposed to the purchase of shares: in the purchase of shares, the company's liabilities follow the target; in the purchase of a business, the purchaser only takes over what the deed says he is taking over. A buyer who discovers the seller's employment, tax or social security debts after the sale is not liable for them - unless there is a takeover clause. Particular vigilance is required, however, with regard to the purchaser's liability for tax during the ninety days following publication of the sale.<\/p>\n<p>The same logic applies to contracts. A distribution agreement, a supply contract, a maintenance contract: none of these are automatically transferred to the buyer. The transfer must be negotiated with each contractual partner. The legal exceptions are precise and limited: the <strong>employment contracts<\/strong> (Article L. 1224-1 of the French Labour Code requires them to be transferred ipso jure in the event of the transfer of an autonomous economic entity) and the <strong>commercial lease<\/strong> (Article L. 145-16 of the French Commercial Code prohibits clauses that would prevent the transfer of the lease with the business).<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"exploitation\">How do you run a business?<\/h2>\n<h3>Direct operation by the owner<\/h3>\n<p>The usual method is to operate the business personally. The owner must carry on the business effectively, be registered in the Trade and Companies Register and not be disqualified from managing it. It is this actual operation that generates and maintains the customer base - and therefore keeps the business alive. A business that is abandoned loses its customer base; a business without a customer base no longer exists (Civ. 3<sup>e<\/sup>, 18 May 1978: a business does not survive the disappearance of the customer base that constitutes its essential element).<\/p>\n<h3>Lease management: operating without buying<\/h3>\n<p>La <strong>lease management<\/strong>, This is a contract whereby the owner of a business grants the right to operate it to a manager, who operates it at his or her own risk, in return for a fee. The manager does not buy the business - he rents it and assumes commercial responsibility for it. For the owner, it's a way of earning income without having to deal with the day-to-day running of the business. For the manager, it's an opportunity to exploit an existing clientele without paying the purchase price - and often a prelude to an acquisition.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"encadre\">\n<div class=\"encadre-title\">Soilihi reform - Law of 19 July 2019<\/div>\n<p>Prior to the Soilihi Act (no. 2019-744 of 19 July 2019), the owner of a business had to have operated it personally for at least three years. <strong>two years<\/strong> before it could be leased out. This condition was often the source of disputes - owners who had received a business by gift or inheritance had to wait two years before being able to entrust it to a manager. It has now been <strong>deleted<\/strong>. Since 20 July 2019, a business owner can immediately lease out his business, regardless of how long he has been running it himself.<\/p>\n<\/aside>\n<p>Management leases are subject to specific formalities. The contract must be published in a legal gazette within the following deadlines <strong>fortnight<\/strong> after it takes effect, and the manager must register with the Registre du Commerce et des Soci\u00e9t\u00e9s. Until this publication, the owner-lessor is <strong>jointly and severally liable<\/strong> with the manager for debts arising from the operation of the business. Solidarity ceases as from the date of publication. This is a risk that is often underestimated: an owner who delays carrying out the formalities or fails to publish remains exposed to the manager's debts, including those that arose before he became aware of them.<\/p>\n<p>A word of caution is also in order when it comes to commercial leases. Some leases contain a clause making management leases subject to the prior agreement of the lessor. You should check the lease before signing the management lease. Failure to obtain the agreement, where required, may result in the termination of the lease - and therefore the disappearance of the right to the lease, an essential element of the business. To find out more about the status of commercial leases and the lessee's rights, see the <a href=\"\/en\/guide-droit-commercial\/commercial-lease\/\">commercial lease guide<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"cession\">Transfer of a business<\/h2>\n<h3>Conditions of validity and obligation to provide information<\/h3>\n<p>The sale of a business is subject to the general conditions for the validity of contracts (capacity of the parties, free and informed consent, lawful object). On one point, the special regime has changed radically. Until 2019, article L. 141-1 of the French Commercial Code required the vendor to include a precise list of compulsory details in the deed of sale: origin of the business, turnover and results for the last three years, statement of pledges and liens, date and term of the lease, and contact details for the lessor. Order no. 2019-1234 of 27 November 2019, issued as part of the Soilihi law, has <strong>removed these compulsory details<\/strong> to simplify transactions.<\/p>\n<p>This deletion does not relieve the vendor of any obligation to provide information. It simply means that the obligation is no longer based on a special text, but on ordinary law. Article <strong>1112-1 of the Civil Code<\/strong> Any party who knows information that is decisive for the other party's consent must disclose it to the other party. Deliberately concealing a major labour dispute in progress, the imminent loss of an authorisation that is essential to the business, or a planning project that directly threatens the business: each of these forms of reticence constitutes a \"breach of contract\". <strong>fraudulent concealment<\/strong> and exposes the seller to having the sale cancelled or having to compensate the buyer. Transparency remains the rule. It has simply changed its basis - from the special to the general.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"encadre\">\n<div class=\"encadre-title\">Art. L. 141-2 C. com. - Accounting documents on transfer<\/div>\n<p>Amended by the Sapin 2 Act (9 Dec. 2016), this article imposes two separate obligations on the seller. To <em>day of sale<\/em>, In the event of a sale, the parties will jointly sign a document showing the monthly sales figures achieved since the end of the last financial year up to the month preceding the sale. During the <em>three years<\/em> following the purchaser's entry into possession, the vendor shall make available to the purchaser, on request, the accounting records for the three financial years preceding the transfer. Any clause to the contrary is deemed unwritten.<\/p>\n<\/aside>\n<h3>Mandatory information for employees<\/h3>\n<p>Since the Hamon Act of 31 July 2014, the owner of a business with fewer than two hundred and fifty employees must inform them of his or her plans to sell the business. This information must be provided no later than <strong>two months before the sale is completed<\/strong>. It allows them to make a takeover offer - but this is not a right of pre-emption: the seller remains entirely free to choose his buyer, even when employees have submitted an offer. Failure to comply is punishable by a civil fine. There are exceptions: sale to a spouse, ascendant or descendant, or if the company is the subject of insolvency proceedings.<\/p>\n<h3>The procedure: publicity, sequestration and opposition<\/h3>\n<p>Once the deed of sale has been signed, a number of publication formalities must be carried out. The sale must be published in a <strong>legal notices<\/strong> and <strong>Official Bulletin of Civil and Commercial Announcements (BODACC)<\/strong>. This publication opens a period of <strong>ten days<\/strong> during which the seller's creditors may object to payment of the price. Opposition blocks the release of the price: it obliges the buyer and the receiver not to release the funds until the opposing creditors have been paid or the opposition has been lifted.<\/p>\n<p>The sale price is held in escrow by a notary or lawyer until all objections have been cleared. This period can extend to several weeks if creditors - tax, social security, former suppliers - lodge objections. If the buyer pays the seller directly before all objections have been purged, he may have to pay the objecting creditors a second time.<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin:2rem 0; border-left:3px solid var(--color-accent-dark); padding-left:1.5rem;\">\n<p style=\"font-family:var(--font-heading); font-weight:700; font-size:0.95rem; margin-bottom:1rem; color:var(--color-primary);\">The 6 stages in selling a business<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style:none; padding:0; margin:0; display:flex; flex-direction:column; gap:0.75rem; font-family:var(--font-heading); font-size:0.875rem;\">\n<li style=\"display:flex; gap:1rem;\"><span style=\"flex-shrink:0; font-weight:700; color:var(--color-accent-dark);\">1.<\/span><span>Employee information (at least 2 months before signature)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"display:flex; gap:1rem;\"><span style=\"flex-shrink:0; font-weight:700; color:var(--color-accent-dark);\">2.<\/span><span>Signature of the deed of sale (preliminary agreement with conditions precedent, then final deed)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"display:flex; gap:1rem;\"><span style=\"flex-shrink:0; font-weight:700; color:var(--color-accent-dark);\">3.<\/span><span>Publication in the legal gazette and the BODACC<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"display:flex; gap:1rem;\"><span style=\"flex-shrink:0; font-weight:700; color:var(--color-accent-dark);\">4.<\/span><span>Opposition period for creditors: 10 days from publication in BODACC<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"display:flex; gap:1rem;\"><span style=\"flex-shrink:0; font-weight:700; color:var(--color-accent-dark);\">5.<\/span><span>Cancellation of oppositions (payment to creditors or discharge)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"display:flex; gap:1rem;\"><span style=\"flex-shrink:0; font-weight:700; color:var(--color-accent-dark);\">6.<\/span><span>Release of the price to the escrow agent and definitive entry into possession<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol><\/div>\n<h3>Seller's warranties: lien and resolutory action<\/h3>\n<p>When the price is not paid in full in cash - which is often the case when the seller grants a vendor loan - the law reserves two guarantees. The <strong>vendor's lien<\/strong>, This agreement, provided for in article L. 141-5, paragraph 2 of the French Commercial Code, gives the seller a preferential right to the resale price of the business if the buyer defaults. It must be registered with the registry in good time. It applies only to those parts of the business expressly listed in the deed of sale and in the registration. A precise breakdown of the price between intangible items, equipment and goods is therefore essential - without this breakdown, the lien may be reduced to zero on certain items.<\/p>\n<p>L'<strong>resolutory action<\/strong>, This right, provided for in article L. 141-6, enables the seller to request the cancellation of the sale - i.e. the return of the business - in the event of non-payment of the price. It is strictly limited to the items forming part of the sale. These two guarantees are subject to formalities relating to time and registration: a seller who delays registering his lien may find himself prevailed upon by a pledgee registered subsequently.<\/p>\n<h3>Non-competition clause<\/h3>\n<p>The seller has a legal obligation not to compete with the buyer. This obligation - a component of the warranty against eviction due to personal acts - exists even without an express clause: a seller who immediately relocated next to the business being sold in order to attract former customers would be in breach of his legal warranty. In practice, deeds of transfer systematically include a clause of <strong>non-establishment<\/strong> which defines the scope of the ban.<\/p>\n<p>To be valid, the clause must be limited in three respects. It must specify the\u2019<strong>activity<\/strong> prohibited - only activities that genuinely compete with those of the business being sold. It must set a <strong>duration<\/strong> reasonable - a few years depending on the nature of the business; a perpetual clause is void. It must define a <strong>geographic scope<\/strong> relevant - a reasonable radius around the business, a town, a department. A clause that is unlimited in any of these three areas is null and void. The prohibition applies to the vendor himself and to his indirect actions: he may not take a financial interest in a competitor's business, work there as an employee to canvass the clientele he has sold, or act through an intermediary. Violation of this rule may result in damages and, if necessary, closure under penalty.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"nantissement\">Pledging a business<\/h2>\n<h3>A non-possessory guarantee<\/h3>\n<p>The pledge of a business is the security that allows a trader to offer his business as collateral for a bank loan without ceasing to operate it. The analogy with a mortgage is a convenient one: a mortgage charges the building without depriving the owner; a pledge charges the business without depriving the operator. The trader keeps his business, continues to manage it, continues to generate sales - and it is precisely these sales that enable him to repay the loan.<\/p>\n<p>Collateral can be <strong>conventional<\/strong> - resulting from an agreement between the debtor and his creditor, typically his bank, in the case of a business loan - or <strong>judicial<\/strong>, In the case of a claim that appears to be well-founded and circumstances that threaten its recovery, the creditor may obtain a protective order from the enforcement judge or the president of the commercial court.<\/p>\n<h3>The base: what you can afford<\/h3>\n<p>The pledge base distinguishes between compulsory and optional elements. The following items must be included in the basis of assessment: the <strong>customers and traffic<\/strong>, l\u2019<strong>sign and trade name<\/strong>, and the <strong>leasehold rights<\/strong>. These elements form the hard core of the business - without them, there is no business, and therefore no valid pledge.<\/p>\n<p>Other elements may be included by express agreement: <strong>machinery and equipment<\/strong>, <strong>patents, trademarks and licences<\/strong>, <strong>goods<\/strong>. In practice, banks systematically include trademarks and patents where they exist and have their own asset value. What cannot be included under any circumstances is real estate, even if it is used for that purpose.<\/p>\n<h3>Incorporation and registration with the Registry<\/h3>\n<p>The pledge must be <strong>recorded in writing<\/strong> (under private seal or notarised). It is only enforceable against third parties from its <strong>registration with the commercial court registry<\/strong> of the place where the business is operated. This registration must be made within <strong>one month<\/strong> from the date of the deed.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"encadre\">\n<div class=\"encadre-title\">Reform of the law on securities - Order of 15 September 2021<\/div>\n<p>Prior to Ordinance no. 2021-1192 of 15 September 2021 (which came into force on 1 September 2021), the Company was required to pay a fee for the services it provided.<sup>er<\/sup> January 2022), failure to register within the one-month time limit resulted in the <em>nullity<\/em> of the pledge - radical sanction. Since the reform, the penalty has been reduced to the payment of a fine.\u2019<em>unenforceability against third parties<\/em> The pledge remains valid between the parties, but cannot be enforced against competing creditors. The reform also simplifies publication formalities and harmonises the territorial jurisdiction of court registries. Pledged creditors are now ranked by <strong>earlier registration date<\/strong> (new article L. 143-15-1 of the French Commercial Code), without further distinction.<\/p>\n<\/aside>\n<h3>The rights of the secured creditor - and its practical limits<\/h3>\n<p>The secured creditor has a <strong>preferential right<\/strong> on the sale or realisation price of the business, in the order of registration. This is the essence of his protection: if the debtor defaults, he will be paid before unsecured creditors, up to the amount of the proceeds of the realisation.<\/p>\n<p>The limits are real, and often underestimated. The secured creditor <strong>has no right of retention<\/strong> Unlike a pledgee with dispossession, the creditor cannot freeze the business in his hands. The debtor remains free to use the business, modify its composition and even reduce its value within the limits of his contractual obligations. Nor can the creditor take legal action to have the business assigned to him in payment.<\/p>\n<p>In the event of <strong>collective procedure<\/strong>, In the case of a pledge, the pledged creditor must declare his claim within the legal time limits, on pain of foreclosure and loss of his preferential right. It is then ranked in the order of registrations for the distribution of the proceeds of the realisation of the assets - after the super-privileged creditors. The absence of a right of retention makes the pledgee's position precarious in the event of a sale plan: the buyer may receive the business without the pledgee being able to physically oppose it.<\/p>\n<p>For these reasons, well-informed creditors often combine the pledge of the business with other securities, such as a personal guarantee from the manager, a pledge of company shares, or a mortgage on real estate. Pledging the business alone does not generally guarantee significant financing. Its effectiveness depends closely on the value of the business at the time of realisation, which may be much lower than the value estimated when the loan was granted. For a more detailed description of the general system of security on movable property, see the <a href=\"\/en\/guide-suretes-garanties\/pledge\/\">guide Pledging and security interests<\/a>.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le fonds de commerce n&rsquo;a jamais \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9fini par la loi. Le Code de commerce l&rsquo;organise et en r\u00e9glemente la cession, le nantissement et la location-g\u00e9rance, mais il ne le d\u00e9finit pas. C&rsquo;est la jurisprudence, depuis un arr\u00eat de la Chambre des requ\u00eates du 15 f\u00e9vrier 1937, qui a fix\u00e9 la notion : un ensemble de biens mobiliers, corporels et incorporels, r\u00e9unis autour d&rsquo;une client\u00e8le. Ce guide expose le r\u00e9gime du fonds tel qu&rsquo;il se pratique en 2026, \u00e0 la lumi\u00e8re des r\u00e9formes de 2019 (suppression des mentions obligatoires, assouplissement de la location-g\u00e9rance) et de 2021 (r\u00e9forme du droit des s\u00fbret\u00e9s).<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"parent":18290,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"page-templates\/template-guide-enfant.php","meta":{"footnotes":""},"solent_domaine":[412,442],"class_list":["post-18376","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/solent-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18376","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/solent-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/solent-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/solent-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18376"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/solent-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18376\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18377,"href":"https:\/\/solent-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18376\/revisions\/18377"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/solent-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18290"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/solent-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18376"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"solent_domaine","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/solent-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/solent_domaine?post=18376"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}