Obtaining a ruling in your favour is only the first step in a long legal process. Without constant vigilance, a court decision, even a final one, can lose all its value and authority. Lapse is one of those formidable technical concepts that punishes inaction or negligence, turning a victory into a mere memory. Understanding its mechanisms, which stem from a specific branch of civil law, is essential if you are to secure your rights.
Lapse in civil proceedings: definition and general principle
Lapse is a legal sanction that affects an act that was initially valid but which, as a result of a subsequent event, suffers the disappearance of an element necessary for its effectiveness. Unlike nullity, which sanctions a defect that was present when the act was formed (such as a defect in a contract), nullity annihilates an act that was perfectly legal at the time it was created. For a full analysis of this concept, please consult our guide on the lapse of time in civil proceedings.
The main consequence of nullity is the retroactive annulment of the act. This means that it is considered never to have existed. A judgment that has lapsed thus loses its most important effect: the interruption of the limitation period. For the claimant creditor, time has never stopped running, and his right to act may be time-barred. To find out more about the risks associated with lapse of documents initiating proceedingsIt is essential to measure its effects.
Lapse of judgments: the trap of the 6-month notification period
Article 478 of the French Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) is the most common reason for a court ruling to lapse. This article states that any judgment rendered by default or deemed to be contradictory must be served on the opposing party (the defendant) within 6 months of its date. If it is not served by bailiff within this period, the judgment is "null and void": it lapses. In this case, all rights are lost.
This penalty, of public order, is automatic and merciless. It applies ipso jure, without the need for a judge to pronounce it. A creditor who has won his case but has delayed in having the decision served will see all his efforts and the entire procedure annihilated. The judgment loses all enforceability, its authority as res judicata disappears, and it can no longer form the basis of any enforcement measures. This scenario is a perfect illustration of the impact of procedural rigour.
The specific case of injunctions to pay: a lapse with major implications
The order for payment procedure, whether national or European, although rapid, is particularly exposed to the risk of lapsing. Article 1411 of the Code of Civil Procedure also requires the claimant creditor to serve the order for payment within six months. Failure to do so renders the order null and void. This strictness is explained by the very nature of this independent procedure, which departs from ordinary litigation and has a unique status.
Reversal of litigation: understanding the logic of sanctions
Injunctions to pay are based on the principle of "reversal of litigation". Unlike a traditional lawsuit where the investigation precedes the decision, here the judge first decides on the basis of the information provided by the creditor (often a contract that has not been respected), and the debate only takes place if the debtor lodges an opposition. The decision is made first, then the case is heard. In this context, the initial order is no more than a "solemn formal notice" under judicial authority. The sanction of nullity is the counterpart of this accelerated procedure: the creditor who benefits from this facility must show absolute diligence to retain the benefit of it and reach a payment agreement.
The concept of fictitious confession (ficta confessio): the silence that condemns
The rigour of the lapse is also explained by the concept of fictitious confession, or ficta confessio. Once the order has been duly served, the debtor's silence is interpreted as an acknowledgement of his debt. Inaction on the part of the debtor is tantamount to tacit agreement, giving the order the force of a contradictory judgment. On the other hand, the creditor's failure to serve the order within the time limit is sanctioned with the same severity by the order lapsing, thus rebalancing the rights of the parties, in accordance with the standard in force.
Sunset and collective proceedings: from foreclosure to unenforceability of the claim
In the context of companies in difficulty (safeguard, receivership or compulsory liquidation), often before the Commercial Court, the penalty for the creditor's inaction is not the lapse of his debt instrument (which may be a contract or a judgment), but the foreclosure of his right to declare it as a liability. This foreclosure has the equally serious consequence of rendering the claim unenforceable against the insolvency proceedings. The creditor's status is then seriously affected.
From extinction to unenforceability: the sanction for failure to declare a claim
Prior to the 2005 Safeguard Act, which was the result of a lengthy parliamentary debate, a claim that had not been declared within the deadline was purely and simply extinguished. The creditor definitively lost his right, including with regard to guarantors. The current version of the legislation resulting from this codification has evolved towards a less radical but equally effective sanction: non-enforceability. An undeclared claim is not extinguished, but it cannot be set up against the collective proceedings. In practical terms, the creditor will not be able to participate in distributions and dividends arising from the insolvency plan or liquidation. While the creditor retains its right against the guarantors (unless otherwise agreed), the fact that it cannot be set up against the proceedings deprives it of any hope of payment by the principal debtor.
The role of legal publicity (BODACC, JAL) as the starting point for time limits
The validity of a procedure depends not only on the actions of the parties, but also on administrative formalities such as legal publicity. Publication of a decision to open insolvency proceedings in the Bulletin officiel des annonces civiles et commerciales (BODACC) or in a Journal d'Annonces Légales (JAL), or even in the Journal Officiel, is a fundamental act. It is this public publication that makes the decision binding on everyone and constitutes the official starting point for a number of mandatory deadlines, in particular the deadline for declaring claims. Creditors cannot ignore publication in the BODACC to justify their delay, as this standard has a major impact.
Challenging the lapse: remedies and relief from foreclosure
It is sometimes possible to avoid the consequences of a claim lapsing or becoming time-barred, in particular by lodging an appeal. The most common form of appeal is the application for "relief from foreclosure". This allows a creditor who has not declared his claim within the deadline to ask the judge to authorise him to do so on an exceptional basis. For full details of the options available, see our guide to how to contest a decision to lapse.
Legitimate cause': key criterion for relief from lapse or foreclosure
The success of such a request depends on proof of a "legitimate reason". This concept, which is assessed by the courts on a case-by-case basis (the case law of the Cour de cassation, particularly its civil division, is abundant on this issue), is not defined by law. However, case law has identified two main categories of legitimate reason. The first is "default not attributable to the creditor", which may result from exceptional circumstances. The second, and more common, is "deliberate omission by the debtor", who has deliberately failed to mention the creditor on the list given to the judicial representative, in breach of the moral contract of the procedure. In this case, the judges consider that the creditor was legitimately prevented from declaring his claim.
Mastering deadlines and formalities is as important as the substance of the law. A legal victory is never won until it has been secured by rigorous notification and enforcement. Lapse is a constant reminder that in the legal field, procedural negligence pays a high price. To secure your decisions and preserve your rights, it is essential to be assisted by a lawyer who is an expert in civil procedure. Contact our firm for an analysis of your situation.
Frequently asked questions
What does it mean when a judgment lapses?
A judgment becomes null and void (i.e. it loses all legal effectiveness) because a subsequent event, most often a failure to notify within a legal time limit, has caused the loss of an element essential to its validity.
How long does it take to serve a judgment?
For judgments rendered by default or deemed to be contradictory, art. 478 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) requires service by a bailiff within six months of the date of the judgment, failing which the judgment is declared null and void.
What is the difference between nullity and invalidity?
Nullity sanctions a defect that existed when the legal act was formed (for example, a defect in consent in a contract). Lapse, on the other hand, affects an act that was perfectly valid at the outset but which loses its effectiveness due to a subsequent event, such as the absence of notification.
What does the unenforceability of a claim mean?
In insolvency proceedings, a claim that is not declared within the deadline becomes unenforceable. This means that it is not extinguished (the initial contract remains valid), but the creditor can no longer use it in the proceedings to obtain payment when the plan is distributed.
Is it possible to be relieved of the foreclosure period for late filing of a claim?
Yes, a creditor can bring proceedings to ask the judge for a "relief from foreclosure". To obtain an agreement, the creditor must prove that the delay is not his fault, for example because the debtor has deliberately omitted him from the list of creditors.
What role does the BODACC play in procedural deadlines?
Publication of a ruling to open insolvency proceedings in the BODACC (Bulletin Officiel) makes the decision binding on all third parties. This public and administrative publication is the official starting point for the deadline for creditors to declare their claims.
EN 
FR