Financial packages combining a bank loan with a life insurance policy are common investment solutions, often presented as advantageous asset transactions. This type of arrangement, where a loan, frequently in fineis used to finance a life insurance investment pledged to the bank, based on the hope that the value of the policy will cover the repayment of the loan at term. However, if the policy does not perform as expected, the borrower may find himself in a tricky situation, having to repay a loan and face a depreciated investment at the same time. In this context, the banking institution, which acts not only as a lender but also as an insurance intermediary, may be held liable. It is essential to understand that the risks of loans allocated to financial investments entail specific obligations for the bank. A poor assessment of the customer's situation or a failure to provide information can open the door to legal action. Our firm has a recognised expertise in banking litigation and enforcement procedures to help borrowers facing these difficulties.
Understanding the role of the bank as an insurance intermediary
General framework and distinction between cases
When a bank offers a loan to be invested in a life insurance product, it is wearing two hats. It is both the lender granting the loan and the intermediary marketing the insurance product. This dual role is fundamental, as it subjects the institution to separate and cumulative liability regimes. The most common arrangement is to take out a repayable loan. in fineThe borrowed funds are invested in a life insurance policy, usually unit-linked. The aim for the investor is that the performance of the investment will eventually enable the loan capital to be repaid while generating a capital gain. However, the financial crises have demonstrated the fragility of this type of bet, exposing many borrowers to substantial losses.
Impact of pledging a life insurance policy
To protect itself against the risk of non-repayment, the lending bank almost invariably requires the life insurance policy to be pledged in its favour. This legal act constitutes a guarantee for the bank. In practical terms, if the borrower defaults or the loan matures, the bank can exercise its right over the pledged policy and recover the sums owed to it by drawing directly on the policy's surrender value. Pledging has major consequences for the borrower: he or she loses free disposal of the funds invested. Any redemption, even partial, or advance on the policy is subject to the bank's prior authorisation. While this guarantee provides security for the lender, it also increases the borrower's dependence on an arrangement whose risks he or she does not always control.
Information requirements under the Insurance Code
Article l. 112-2 of the insurance code: information sheet and draft contract
The Insurance Code strictly regulates the pre-contractual phase of taking out an insurance policy. Article L. 112-2 requires the intermediary, in this case the bank, to provide the future policyholder with clear and precise documents before signing the contract. An information sheet must be provided, detailing the cover offered, any exclusions and the cost of the contract. In addition, the borrower-policyholder must receive a copy of the draft contract or an information leaflet setting out the key points. This transparency requirement is designed to ensure that the customer's consent is informed and that they are fully aware of the characteristics of the product and the commitments they are about to make. The provision of these documents is a fundamental first step in protecting policyholders.
Article l. 132-5-2 of the insurance code: information memorandum and waiver option
For life insurance policies, article L. 132-5-2 reinforces these provisions. The bank must provide the customer with a specific information memorandum in return for a receipt. This document must highlight the key provisions of the contract, particularly for unit-linked policies, and above all the conditions for exercising the waiver option. Policyholders have 30 calendar days in which to cancel their policy once it has been taken out. Failure by the bank to comply with its information obligations has a direct and powerful sanction: the starting date of this waiver period is postponed to the day on which the documents are actually delivered, up to a limit of eight years. This extension constitutes a significant weapon for customers who have not been properly informed.
Article l. 132-27-1 of the insurance code: policyholder requirements and needs
One of the intermediary's most important obligations is set out in article L. 132-27-1. Before concluding the contract, the bank must enquire about the customer's financial situation, underwriting objectives and financial knowledge and experience. On the basis of the information gathered, it must formalise in writing the requirements and needs expressed by the policyholder and, above all, the reasons for providing advice on a specific contract. In other words, the bank must justify the suitability of the product offered to the customer's profile. If the customer fails to provide the information requested, the bank is obliged to issue a warning. This obligation to provide personalised advice lies at the heart of the protection afforded to unsophisticated investors.
The duties of life insurance intermediaries (article l. 520-1 of the insurance code)
Prior information on identity and links
Article L. 520-1 of the French Insurance Code imposes a duty of full transparency on the bank, as an intermediary, even before an initial contract is concluded. The bank must clearly disclose its identity and its registration as an insurance intermediary, and inform the customer of any recourse procedures available. Crucially, it must also disclose the existence of any financial links or contractual exclusivity obligation with one or more insurance companies. This information is essential so that customers can assess the degree of independence of the intermediary they are dealing with and understand whether the products offered are based on their intrinsic quality or on a commercial partnership.
Specification of the policyholder's requirements and needs
This provision reinforces the obligations we have already seen. The intermediary must clearly set out the customer's requirements and needs. This is not a mere formality, but an active process of questioning and listening. The advice provided must be the logical conclusion of this analysis. The law specifies that the level of detail must be adapted to the complexity of the insurance contract proposed. For a sophisticated arrangement such as a loan backed by unit-linked life insurance, the intermediary's duty is even more onerous. The intermediary must ensure that the customer not only understands the mechanism, but also that it really does correspond to the customer's personal situation and financial objectives.
Advice based on an objective analysis of the market
Article L. 520-1 distinguishes between several levels of advice. If the bank claims to provide "advice based on an objective analysis of the market", its obligations are maximal. It cannot simply offer its partners' products. It must analyse a sufficient number of contracts available on the market to be able to recommend, on the basis of professional and objective criteria, the one best suited to the policyholder's needs. If the bank is unable to carry out such an analysis, it must inform the customer and specify that it can, at the customer's request, provide the names of the insurance companies with which it works. This distinction is fundamental because it determines the scope of the duty to advise and, consequently, the basis for any liability action.
Penalties for breaches and remedies for the insured borrower
Loss of opportunity and compensation for damage
When a banking institution fails to fulfil its obligations to provide information or advice, it commits a fault for which it may be held liable. The sanction most commonly applied by the courts is not compensation for the entire financial loss suffered, but compensation for the loss of an opportunity. The case law considers that if the borrower had been properly informed of the risks, he would have had a chance not to take out the loan or to opt for a less risky investment. The loss that can be compensated therefore corresponds to this lost opportunity, and not to the entire capital that would have evaporated. The amount of compensation is set by the judge, who assesses it on a case-by-case basis. This concept is at the heart of the banker's liability for breach of his duty to advise and warn.
Relationship with misleading commercial practices
In addition to contractual civil liability, the bank's failings can sometimes be classified as misleading commercial practices, an offence punishable under the Consumer Code. This offence is punishable under the French Consumer Code, and may be applied where the presentation of a financial product has been deliberately unbalanced, for example by placing heavy emphasis on the prospects of gains while concealing or minimising the risks of capital loss. Advertising or commercial documentation that proves to be inaccurate, unclear or misleading may thus form the basis of an action. Borrowers who feel they have been wronged can explore this avenue, which complements the liability action for breach of the duty to advise. This is a complex area that illustrates how misleading commercial practices offer specific protection to borrowers.
The complexity of the financial arrangements linking loans and life insurance and the stringency of the obligations placed on intermediary banks make litigation in this area particularly technical. If you feel that you have been the victim of inadequate advice or information in connection with an investment of this kind, it is vital to have your case analysed by a professional. For an in-depth assessment of your situation and an appropriate legal strategy, contact our law firm.
Sources
- Insurance Code
- Consumer Code
- Monetary and Financial Code
EN 
FR