The distribution of funds is the final stage of debt collection, where the funds obtained are distributed among the creditors. This phase, far from being a simple formalityis governed by a complex set of rules, defined in particular by the code of civil procedurewhich determine the order of payment and each person's share. Ignorance of these mechanisms can have major financial consequences, whether you are a creditor seeking to recover what you owe or a debtor whose property has been realised. Faced with this technicality, the assistance of a lawyer specialising in enforcement procedures is often essential to secure the rights of the parties. This article gives you an overview of the principles and main stages in the distribution of funds, and guides you towards more detailed analyses for each situation.
Introduction to the general principles of money distribution
The legal framework for the distribution of funds between creditors has undergone major changes with the reforms of enforcement procedures, in particular the law of 9 July 1991. Previously, distinct and sometimes confusing procedures coexisted, such as "distribution by contribution" for seizures of movable property or "order" for seizures of goods. price buildings. Legislation, through more than one text modernised and unified these mechanisms, a major version completed by the decree of 14 August 1996, which introduced a specific procedure for distribution other than by compulsory execution. Today, there are two main systems: distribution amicableThis includes the distribution of assets, excluding seizures, and the distribution of assets following an enforcement order.
Distribution of funds outside any enforcement proceedings
Often, a sum of money has to be divided between several creditors without first being seized. This situation typically arises in the case of sale voluntary sale of a business or a company. company. The holder of the price cannot be satisfied with pay the seller; it must ensure that the distribution is in line with the law. To explore the mechanisms specific to these scenarios in greater depth, it is essential to master the distribution procedure amicable (scheduled forarticle 1281-1 et seq. of the Code of civil procedure), which provides a regulated framework for distributing funds without resorting to coercion.
Implementing and contesting the amicable distribution plan
In the event of disagreement, the most diligent party (vendor, creditor, etc.) may refer the matter to the interim relief judge. The judge will appoint a person in charge distribution (an escrow agent). This person establishes a project after collecting the claims declarations. The creditors and the debtor have a period of deadline of fifteen days à count of the reception of the notification to contest this project. If a dispute persists despite an attempt at conciliation, the procedure becomes judicial and the court will decide.
Distribution of funds resulting from enforcement proceedings
When the funds come from a sale seizure, the rules become stricter. The procedure organises the payment of creditors who have come forward during the seizure. Although this article focuses on seizures of movable property, the purpose of the seizure procedure real estate is also the distribution of price from salein different ways that deserve to be examined in greater detail. information and analysis.
Distribution after a seizure
Following a seizure and sale, the product of the sale is distributed by the justiceacting asagent in charge of the sale. If there is only one creditor, he is paid up to the amount of his claim. If there are several creditors, a project distribution amicable is proposed. The process of the distribution of assets following a seizure of movable property follows strict rules, in particular on the role of the statutory auditor. justice and the management of disputes, often initiated by letter recommended with acknowledgement of receipt.
Specific schemes for ships and aircraft
Data entry and sale of goods such as a ship or an aircraft are subject to derogation regimes provided for by an text specific Code transport. These procedures, which often involve a context of exchange internationalThis means that registered creditors who hold a mortgage must be identified and their own order of payment of liens must be established. Please refer to the derogations for ships and aircraft to understand the subtleties, particularly in the context of regulations European and international.
Concurrence of creditors and order of liens
At the heart of distribution is the principle of competing creditors: how can they be ranked when there are insufficient funds? The lawand the judicial case law which interprets it, distinguishes preferential creditors, who are paid in priority, from unsecured creditors. With certain exceptions, and regardless of the shape of the seizure, the first distrainor has no special privilege. The various privileges (costs from justiceTreasury, landlord) is highly technical in this area. material and is a major source of litigation.
The central role of the enforcement judge (JEX)
Although the law has sought to "dijudiciarise" distribution, the Enforcement Judge (JEX) remains a key player. He has jurisdiction over all difficulties relating to a enforcement order and disputes arising from enforcement. It intervenes when the project is disputed and conciliation fails. Its decisions are judgements, a act with theauthority res judicata and subject to appeal. If the enforcement agent fails to comply, it is possible toengage the responsibility of a commissioner of justice.
Specific features of insolvency proceedings and overindebtedness
The distribution rules are profoundly altered when the debtor is subject to collective proceedings (safeguard, reorganisation, etc.), liquidation) or in over-indebtedness. These special schemes have their own logic.
Impact of insolvency proceedings
The opening of collective proceedings puts an end to individual lawsuits. The distribution of funds is then managed by the trustee or liquidator. judicial as part of the liquidationThe order of payment is strict, favouring claims arising for the purposes of the proceedings. In addition, the nullities of the "suspect period" may make it possible to cancel acts performed just before the opening judgment, thereby reinstating assets in the assets to be distributed.
The over-indebtedness regime for individuals
The aim of the over-indebtedness procedure, which is reserved for individuals acting in good faith, is to find a lasting solution. The measures range from simple rescheduling to personal recovery, which can lead to the total cancellation of non-business debts, a real "debt recovery". back for the debtor. It is crucial to understand interactions between over-indebtedness and seizure procedures to effectively protect the debtor.
In view of the technical nature of these procedures, whether it be to contest a project or to optimise collections, the use of a lawyer with expertise in enforcement is a strategic step in asserting your rights.
Frequently asked questions
What is the distribution of funds?
The distribution of funds is the legal procedure that consists of distributing a sum of money from a trust to the beneficiaries. sale seizure, between the various creditors of the same debtor, in accordance with an order of priority defined by the law. law.
What is the difference between amicable and forced distribution?
Distribution amicable takes place outside of any seizure, for example after the sale the voluntary sale of a business, such as the has l'article 1281-1 of the Code of civil procedure. Forced distribution follows an enforcement measure such as seizure and sale, and is subject to stricter rules.
Are all creditors paid in the same way?
No. Preferential creditors (Treasury, employees, mortgagees) are paid first. Unsecured creditors (those with no specific guarantee) share the remainder proportionally (at rate of the "marc le franc") to the amount of their claim.
What is the role of the enforcement judge (JEX)?
The Enforcement Judge intervenes mainly to settle disputes that arise during distribution, for example in the case of dispute on the amount of a claim or on the order of payments, when conciliation has failed.
Do over-indebtedness proceedings change the rules?
Yes, profoundly. The over-indebtedness procedure for private individuals puts in place a global treatment plan that takes precedence over traditional distribution rules. It can lead to rescheduling or even total cancellation of debts.
What happens if there is disagreement over the proposed distribution?
In the event of dispute a project In the event of disagreement, a conciliation attempt is made. If the disagreement persists, the dispute is referred to the Enforcement Judge, who will hand down a decision. judicial to decide the dispute after examining the document and supporting documents.
EN 
FR