You've spent months, even years, developing an innovative product, building a strong brand image, investing heavily in advertising to make your offer known. And then a competitor comes on the market and seems to take a little too much inspiration from your work, adopting your concept, your colours, your style, without having spent as much time and money. You have the unpleasant impression that he's "surfing your wave", that he's taking advantage of your efforts without any money down. This frustrating and damaging situation could well fall under what lawyers call the economic parasitisma subtle but very real form of unfair competitionin the same way as other unlawful attacks. What exactly is parasitism? How can it be distinguished from mere inspiration or authorised copying? What forms can it take and, above all, how can you prove it to defend your interests?
What exactly is economic parasitism?
The term may seem strong, but it aptly describes the reality of this practice. Case law defines economic parasitism as all forms of behaviour in which one economic agent follows in the footsteps of another in order to benefit, without spending anything, from the latter's efforts and know-how. In simpler terms, it's the act of 'sticking' to a successful company, in order to benefit for free from its reputation, its investments or the value it has created.
The central element of parasitism is not necessarily to mislead the consumer by creating confusion (although this is often the case), but rather to make a undue profit by making the economic value generated by the efforts of others. The parasite seeks to avoid the costs and risks associated with innovation, creation or promotion, by simply following the path blazed by someone else. It is this unjustified capture of value, this breach of equality in competition, that constitutes fault.
Unlike other forms of unfair competition, where simple negligence may suffice, the identification of parasitism often involves demonstrating a certain degree of "unfairness". will on the part of the parasite to deliberately place itself in the wake of its victim. The courts often look for a body of corroborating evidence showing this intention to profit unduly from the work of others.
It is therefore crucial to distinguish parasitism from simple confusion. If a competitor creates a risk of confusion through clumsiness or negligence (for example, by choosing a name that is too close to yours without checking), this will be punished as classic unfair competition. If, on the other hand, he deliberately copies elements of your offer, even if they are not specifically protected, with the aim of benefiting from your reputation or saving his own development costs, this is tantamount to parasitism. The two can, of course, co-exist.
The main forms of parasitism
Parasitism can manifest itself in many ways, as economic players have fertile imaginations when it comes to trying to profit from the successes of others. Broadly speaking, there are two main situations:
1. Parasitism between competitors (or "parasitic competition")
This is the most common case, where a company directly parasitises one of its rivals in the same market. This can take several forms:
- Imitating the commercial organisation The aim is to include elements that make it possible to identify the competing company or that contribute to its commercial success. This includes :
- A strong copy or imitation of distinctive signs Even if they are not registered as trademarks, it may be wrong to use them if the aim is to take advantage of the reputation acquired by the first user.
- The resumption of advertising concepts imitate a striking slogan, an original visual campaign or a tried and tested communication style.
- Imitating the presentation of points of sale or websites Copy the layout of a shop, the atmosphere, the look and feel of a website to create an association in the public's mind and benefit from the appeal developed by the competitor.
- Imitation of products or services : This is a trickier area. In principle, copying a product or service that is not protected by a patent, design patent or copyright is a criminal offence. free. This is permitted by the freedom of trade. However, this copying, even if it is slavish (i.e. very faithful), can become a wrongful act of parasitism if :
- It enables the copier to make a substantial and unjustified savings saving all the costs of research, development, design and fine-tuning that the first company had to bear. It's reaping without sowing.
- It is accompanied by manoeuvres creating wrongful confusion in consumers' minds about the origin of the product.
- It aims to deliberately taking advantage of the notoriety acquired by the original product.
2. Parasitism between non-competitors (or "parasitic acts")
Parasitism can also exist even if the companies concerned do not operate in the same market and are not in direct competition with each other. This is the case when a company seeks to take undue advantage of the company's reputation or positive image of another company, often a very well-known one, to promote its own products or services, even if they have nothing to do with each other. The idea is to create a flattering association of ideas in the public mind.
Classic examples include using a luxury brand name for low-end products, parodying a very famous advertisement for an unrelated product, or using the universe of a well-known character (film, comic strip, etc.) without authorisation to sell something else. Even if the customers are not the same, the victimised company suffers damage because its reputation and image, built up at great expense, are exploited without compensation and sometimes devalued. The courts therefore accept that these parasitic acts, even though they are not in direct competition, constitute a fault for which the perpetrator is liable under article 1240 of the Civil Code.
Parasitism vs. authorised copying: where do you draw the line?
This is where the difficulty lies in the fight against parasitism: where does legitimate inspiration, the adoption of 'trendy' ideas or the copying of unprotectable elements stop, and where does the wrongful appropriation of someone else's work begin?
It bears repeating: in principle, copying elements that are not protected by intellectual property rights (patents, trademarks, designs and models, copyright) is free. This is an essential condition for competition and innovation. Taking inspiration from a competitor, adopting a good idea that is not legally reserved, or adopting technical or aesthetic standards that are commonplace in a sector is not, in itself, wrong.
Parasitic error occurs when copying goes beyond mere inspiration to become a systematic and comprehensive appropriation the efforts and investments of a competitor, with the clear aim of sparing themselves these same efforts and profiting directly from them. It's often a question of degree and context. Copy a unprotected element is generally accepted; copying all the characteristics of a product or commercial strategy, without adding any value of its own, becomes suspect.
There are also cases where the similarity is justified and therefore cannot be faulted. This is the case when the similarity is dictated by functional or technical requirements (for example, two parts must have the same shape to fit on the same appliance) or by industry standards. In these situations, the manufacturer has no real choice, and the resemblance is not the result of a desire to parasitise but of an external constraint. The manufacture of compatible products or spare parts is therefore generally considered to be lawful, as it promotes competition and consumer choice, unless it is accompanied by specific unfair practices (confusion as to origin, denigration, etc.).
How can parasitism be proven and punished?
Proving parasitism often requires the gathering of an cluster of clues convincing to the judge. It will typically be necessary to demonstrate :
- The existence of a previous economic value created by the victim: established reputation, substantial advertising investment, major research and development efforts, specific know-how, etc.
- La recovery or imitation of this value by the competitor: show concretely the elements copied (design, name, concept, advertising, etc.).
- L'lack of significant own efforts on the part of the parasite: demonstrate that it has not made the same investments, that it has sought to make savings by copying.
- La desire to follow in the footsteps Even if it is not always required, proving the parasite's intention to take advantage of the victim's reputation or efforts considerably strengthens the case.
Le damage suffered as a result of parasitism is often specific. There is not necessarily an immediate loss of sales (especially if there is no confusion). Rather, the damage lies in :
- La trivialisation the victim's offer or image (what was unique becomes commonplace).
- La dilution its reputation or the distinctive nature of its products/services.
- La loss of competitive advantage from the initial investments.
- Le commercial disturbance linked to the very fact that a third party is profiting unfairly from your efforts.
As a result, theassessment of damages in cases of parasitism is often tricky. Judges are increasingly tending to calculate it not only on the basis of the loss suffered by the victim, but also (and sometimes above all) on the basis of the savings made by the parasite or profits he was able to make of its unfair practices. The aim is to deprive him of his undue advantage and deter such practices.
In addition to damages, the victim may, of course, ask the judge to order the termination parasitic acts (prohibition on using the copied elements, withdrawal of products, etc.) and the publication of the judgement to set the record straight.
Economic parasitism is an insidious attack on the value created by work, investment and innovation. It is essential for companies to be vigilant and to know how to react to this type of behaviour, which, under the guise of simple inspiration, can constitute a serious and damaging offence.
Parasitism is an insidious form of unfair competition that can damage your investments and your image. If you suspect that a competitor is taking unfair advantage of your efforts, our firm can provide you with specialist legal support to analyse the situation and take effective action. For a specialised legal supportcontact us.
Sources
- Civil Code: Article 1240, Article 1241.
- Constant case law from the Cour de cassation and the Courts of Appeal on the definition and punishment of economic parasitism.
This is the sixth article in the series, detailing the penalties and procedures applicable in the event of unfair competition.
EN 
FR