When a company or individual carries out a banking transaction with a foreign player, one question quickly arises: in the event of a dispute, which law applies? This question, far from being anecdotal, is at the heart of the legal security of international transactions. The apparent complexity of the rules can be daunting, yet understanding them is essential to anticipating risks and protecting your rights. The aim of this article is to give you an overview of the mechanisms that determine the law applicable to your cross-border banking contracts. Each of the points covered is then detailed in specific technical articles. For a support from experts in international banking law to secure your transactions and resolve disputesIf you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
What is a conflict of laws in international banking?
A conflict of laws arises when a legal situation, such as a loan contract or the opening of an account, has links with several national legal systems. For example, a French entrepreneur who takes out a loan with a German bank to finance a project in Italy creates an international situation. Determining the applicable law means identifying the rules that will govern the contract, from its formation to its performance, and that will decide in the event of disagreement. The aim is to provide predictability and certainty for all parties involved.
The growing internationalisation of banking operations
The globalisation of trade has increased the number of cross-border financial transactions. Whether for project financing, export guarantees or simple payment services, economic players are increasingly required to contract with foreign banks. This internationalisation makes the question of applicable law particularly important. A misunderstood clause or an unforeseen rule of law can turn a profitable transaction into a costly and complex dispute. Knowing which law governs the relationship is therefore a fundamental precaution.
The basic instruments of conflict-of-laws law in banking matters
Within the European Union, the legal framework for determining the law applicable to contracts is largely unified. For contracts concluded after 17 December 2009, the Rome I Regulation applies. For older contracts, the 1980 Rome Convention remains the reference. These two texts, which are universal in nature, apply even if the designated law is that of a non-EU country. They establish a clear hierarchy of principles for resolving conflicts of law, providing a structured method for identifying the law governing banking contractual obligations.
The principle of party autonomy: the cornerstone of international banking law
The first and most important principle is freedom of choice. The parties to an international banking contract are free to choose the law that will govern their agreement. This choice may be explicitly stated in a clause of the contract. It is therefore perfectly possible to stipulate that French, English or Swiss law will apply. This freedom allows companies to choose a legal framework that they are familiar with or that seems neutral and predictable. This fundamental principle of freedom of choice, known as party autonomy, is not absolute. For a detailed analysis of its mechanisms and limits, You can read our article on the principles and limits of party autonomy in the choice of law for cross-border banking contracts..
If there is no choice: the law of the country with the closest links and the pre-eminence of the law of the bank
What happens if the contract does not mention any applicable law? In this case, European legislation provides for subsidiary connecting factors. The contract will be governed by the law of the country with which it is "most closely connected". To determine these links, the regulation establishes a strong presumption: it is considered that the contract is most closely linked to the country of residence of the party providing the "characteristic service". In the majority of banking transactions, this service is provided by the bank. Consequently, in the absence of choice, the law of the country where the bank has its head office (or the branch concerned) will generally apply. To understand this essential rule in detail, please read our article on the pre-eminence of the law of the bank in determining the law applicable to interbank accounts and transactions.
Limits to the general principles: consumer protection and police laws
The freedom of choice of the parties and the pre-eminence of the law of the bank are not without limits. Two categories of major exceptions exist to protect interests deemed to be superior. On the one hand, specific provisions aim to protect the weaker party to the contract, in particular the consumer. Even if a foreign law has been chosen, the consumer cannot be deprived of the protection afforded by the mandatory rules of his country of residence. For further information on this subject, please see our article on derogations from the law of autonomy for consumer protection in international banking law.
Secondly, there are "mandatory rules". These are national standards considered so essential to safeguarding the public interests of a State (political, social or economic organisation) that they apply imperatively, regardless of the law normally applicable to the contract. The court hearing the dispute will thus be able to give effect to them and set aside the law chosen by the parties. This complex mechanism is explored in our article on an in-depth analysis of mandatory rules and their imperative role in international banking law.
Main international banking transactions and determination of the applicable law
The general principles outlined above apply to all international banking transactions. However, their application may vary depending on the nature of the transaction. For account agreements, the law of the bank holding the account applies with particular force. For loans, whether bilateral or syndicated, the law of the lending institution is the starting point, but the structuring of the financing may introduce nuances. Lastly, securities and guarantees (surety, mortgage, independent guarantee) are often subject to their own law, independent of that of the credit they guarantee. Each transaction therefore requires a specific analysis to correctly identify the law applicable to each facet of the contractual relationship.
The impact of Brexit on the law applicable to banking contracts
The United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union has raised many questions. With regard to the law applicable to contracts, however, the impact on French courts is more limited than one might think. Because of the "universal" nature of the Rome I Regulation, a French judge will continue to apply it to determine the applicable law, even if the contract is bound in the UK. If English law is designated by the contract or by the conflict rules, the French judge will apply it. The complexity is even greater for UK institutions that have lost the benefit of the "European passport", which may affect the continuity of certain existing contracts, particularly those involving the provision of new banking services post-Brexit. The situation calls for increased vigilance in the drafting and management of contracts relating to the United Kingdom.
To secure your international banking transactions and obtain an analysis tailored to your situation, contact our firm. Our lawyers will provide you with their expertise in navigating these complex issues.
Frequently asked questions
What is a conflict of laws in banking matters?
This is a situation where a banking contract or transaction is linked to several countries, which raises the question of which national law will apply in the event of a dispute.
Can I choose any law to govern my international loan contract?
Yes, the principle is freedom of choice (autonomy of will). However, this choice cannot deprive a consumer of the protection of his national law, and it can be overridden by overriding laws.
What law applies if my contract is silent?
In general, the applicable law is that of the country with which the contract is "most closely connected". In the case of banking transactions, this is presumed to be the country where the bank has its registered office or the branch concerned.
Are there any exceptions to these general rules?
Yes, the two main exceptions are consumer protection rules and "police laws", which are national provisions deemed to be fundamental and which must be applied.
Has Brexit changed the law applicable to my contracts with English banks?
For a French judge, the rules for determining the applicable law (Rome I Regulation) remain the same. The main impact of Brexit concerns the ability of UK banks to provide services in the EU.
Why is it important for my company to know which law applies?
Knowing the applicable law enables you to anticipate risks, provide legal certainty for your transactions and avoid unforeseen legal or financial consequences in the event of a disagreement with your banking partner.
EN 
FR