The International Monetary Fund, or IMF, is a familiar name, often associated with major global economic crises. Yet its precise role and real influence on national economies, and by extension on businesses, are often poorly understood. As a central player among the international financial institutionsThe IMF's main mission is to ensure the stability of the global financial system. Navigating this complex regulatory environment requires a detailed understanding of its mechanisms. This article sets out to decipher the fundamental missions of this organisation, from its creation to its most recent interventions, in order to better understand its impact on global financial stability.
Origins and development of the IMF: from Bretton Woods to the current crisis
Creation and original functions
The history of the IMF began in 1944, at the Bretton Woods Conference. Meeting against the backdrop of the end of the Second World War, the representatives of 44 allied countries shared a common desire: to avoid a repeat of the economic disorders of the 1930s, marked by competitive currency devaluations that had paralysed international trade. To achieve this, they laid the foundations for a new international monetary system based on exchange rate stability and currency convertibility. The IMF was created with a clear mission: to guarantee compliance with these new rules of the game. Its primary function was to ensure the supply of liquidity to countries facing temporary imbalances in their balance of payments, thereby preventing sudden and destabilising adjustments.
The IMF as guarantor of international financial stability
The abandonment of the fixed exchange rate system in the early 1970s could have meant the end of the IMF. However, the institution has shown a remarkable capacity to adapt. Far from disappearing, it has redefined its role to meet the new challenges of a globalised economy. The once clear distinction between the monetary and financial spheres has gradually blurred. In this new paradigm, the IMF's mission expanded. It was no longer simply a matter of monitoring the stability of currencies, but of ensuring the stability of the international financial system as a whole. This development established the IMF as a pillar of the global financial architecture, a role that has grown stronger with each successive crisis.
Support for member states: financial and logistical assistance
Role as lender of last resort and guarantor of liquidity
The IMF's financial support for its 190 member states is its best-known facet. As early as the 1980s, with the Third World debt crisis, the IMF began granting loans on favourable terms to developing countries to prevent international trade from grinding to a halt. This role of "lender of last resort" was confirmed during the financial crises of the 1990s in Asia, Russia and Latin America, when the IMF intervened to reassure the markets and prevent systemic contagion. The 2008 and 2010 sovereign debt crises in Europe confirmed this role, leading the IMF to provide unprecedented financial assistance to European countries such as Greece and Latvia. Today, it is seen as the main guarantor of the liquidity of the international financial system.
Technical assistance and economic, legal and political advice
In addition to financial support, the IMF provides a significant amount of advice and technical assistance, which accounts for almost a third of its expenditure. This logistical support is tailored to the specific needs of each country. It may involve helping a country to modernise its monetary policies, diversify its sources of public revenue or optimise tax collection. A significant part of this assistance is devoted to building legal frameworks aligned with international standards. The IMF pays particular attention to the fight against money laundering and the financing of terrorism, helping countries to strengthen their administrative and legal capacities to facilitate the exchange of tax information and guard against tax evasion.
The example of the response to covid-19
The Covid-19 health crisis was an opportunity for the IMF to demonstrate the scale and diversity of its intervention tools. In response to the emergency, the institution deployed unprecedented financial support. More than 100 countries benefited from emergency financing, designed to provide rapid assistance without the constraints of a traditional loan programme. At the same time, some thirty of the most vulnerable countries received immediate debt relief. The IMF also broke new ground by creating a short-term liquidity line for countries whose economic fundamentals were sound but which needed short-term support. This mobilisation was accompanied by intensive logistical support, which was reflected in the national measures taken at the same time. In this respect, the support provided to businesses and individuals in the face of the emergency, as described in our article on exceptional measures in banking law linked to Covid-19This is part of an overall approach to preserving the economic fabric that the IMF has supported on a global scale by helping more than 160 countries with cash management, financial surveillance and cybersecurity issues.
Global macroeconomic surveillance: conditionality and criticism
Structural adjustment programmes and their evolution
The IMF's financial aid does not come without a quid pro quo. From the 1980s onwards, loans were accompanied by what is known as "conditionality", embodied in the Structural Adjustment Programmes (SAPs). Imposed in collaboration with the World Bank, these programmes aimed to restore macroeconomic equilibrium in borrowing countries. They often consisted of far-reaching economic reforms: cuts in public spending, massive privatisations, opening up of trade, or even the abolition of subsidies. This approach placed dozens of countries under a form of economic trusteeship and was strongly criticised. Economists such as Joseph Stiglitz have pointed out the high social cost and sometimes questionable effectiveness of these measures. In response to these criticisms, the IMF changed its instruments by creating Enhanced Structural Adjustment Programmes (ESAPs), seeking to better offset the social repercussions of its policies, particularly in the education and health sectors.
Global surveillance and early warning exercise
In addition to targeted surveillance of programme countries, the IMF carries out overall macroeconomic surveillance of all its members. This surveillance covers a wide range of policies: exchange rates, budgets, monetary and financial policies, as well as structural reforms. More recently, the scope of its analysis has been extended to cross-cutting issues such as climate change and digital transformation, which are recognised as essential to economic stability. The aim of this ongoing monitoring is to detect potential risks and recommend adjustments to support growth and stability. Since the crisis of 2008, this preventive mission has been reinforced by an "early warning exercise", conducted twice a year. This is a low-probability but high-impact risk assessment designed to identify vulnerabilities that could trigger systemic shocks on a global scale.
The Financial Sector Assessment Programme (FSAP)
Aware that a banking crisis in a single country can quickly spread worldwide, the IMF launched the Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) in 1999. This programme consists of a complete and in-depth analysis of the financial sector in each member country. Conducted jointly with the World Bank in emerging and developing countries, and by the IMF alone in advanced economies, the FSAP has a dual objective. The first part, led by the IMF, assesses financial stability by measuring the resilience of banks and the quality of national supervision. The second component, operated by the World Bank, focuses on the development needs of the financial sector, by assessing the quality of the legal framework, the efficiency of payment systems and the obstacles to competitiveness. More than three-quarters of IMF members have already undergone such an assessment.
solent avocats' expertise in dealing with imf issues
The IMF's interventions, its policy recommendations and the international standards it promotes have concrete repercussions on the legislative and regulatory frameworks of its member states. For companies involved in international trade, cross-border mergers and acquisitions or complex financing operations, an understanding of this environment is essential. Prudential rules, anti-money laundering standards and financial transparency requirements stemming from these global dynamics translate into direct obligations. The involvement of a lawyer with expertise in banking and finance law is therefore essential to anticipate risks, secure transactions and ensure compliance. If you are faced with international financial regulation issues, contact our team atbanking and finance lawyers for an appropriate analysis.
Sources
- Bretton Woods Agreement (1944)
- Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund
EN 
FR