Significant imbalance is a central concept in French contract law, designed to restore a form of justice where the economic power of one party risks crushing the other. Initially developed to protect consumers, its influence has spread to relationships between professionals and has even been enshrined in general law. Navigating its various applications is essential for any economic player, whether a company director or an individual. This article provides an overview of its three main regimes, each aspect being developed in greater detail in our dedicated articles. Mastering these rules helps to anticipate risks and secure contractual relationships, a challenge for which our expertise in commercial law provides decisive help.
Introduction to significant imbalance: origins and issues
The concept of significant imbalance represents a break with the purely voluntarist view of contracts, where the mere meeting of minds was sufficient to justify their binding force. Modern law accepts that a contract is not always the result of balanced negotiation. On the contrary, it may reflect a situation of domination in which one party imposes its conditions on another, who is forced to accept them wholesale. It is to correct these situations that the legislator has intervened.
The concept first emerged in consumer law in the 1970s, with the fight against unfair terms. The idea was simple: to protect the consumer, considered to be the weaker party, from a professional who might abuse his position to impose terms creating an excessive advantage for him. Gradually, this protection was extended. The legislator recognised that similar imbalances existed in relations between businesses, particularly between major distributors and their suppliers. Finally, the major reform of contract law in 2016 enshrined a mechanism for controlling significant imbalances in ordinary law, but confined it to contracts of adhesion. Today, three systems coexist, each with its own scope of application and its own criteria.
Significant imbalance in consumer law: protecting weaker parties
Consumer law is the historical cradle of the control of significant imbalance. Article L. 212-1 of the Consumer Code defines as unfair any clause whose purpose or effect is to create, to the detriment of the consumer or non-professional, a significant imbalance between the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract. This regime applies to contracts concluded between a professional and a consumer, i.e. a natural person acting for personal purposes.
The assessment of whether a term is unfair is made at the time the contract is concluded, taking into account all the circumstances. To guide judges and professionals, the regulatory authority has drawn up lists of terms presumed to be unfair. The "black list" (article R. 212-1) lists terms that are irrefutably prohibited, such as those that remove the consumer's right to compensation. The "grey list" (article R. 212-2) contains terms that are merely presumed to be unfair; the professional can then try to prove that they do not create an imbalance in the specific context of the contract. Any clause deemed unfair is "deemed unwritten": it is purely and simply deleted from the contract, which remains applicable in all other respects.
For a detailed analysis of black and grey clauses and possible remedies, you can improve consumer protection against unfair terms and significant imbalances.
Significant imbalance in restrictive competition practices: regulating inter-company relations
The legislator has transposed the concept of significant imbalance to commercial relations in order to make practices more ethical, particularly in the mass retail sector. Article L. 442-1, I, 2° of the French Commercial Code makes it an offence for an economic player to "subject or attempt to subject the other party to obligations that create a significant imbalance in the rights and obligations of the parties".
This regime is clearly distinct from that of consumer law. Firstly, it applies to relationships between professionals. Secondly, it is not enough to establish an imbalance in the contract: it is necessary to prove the existence of a 'submission' or an attempt at submission. This criterion implies an absence of real negotiation, with the weaker party forced to accept the conditions imposed. Above all, and this is a major difference, the judge's review here can focus on whether the price is appropriate to the service, which is excluded in consumer law and ordinary law.
The penalties are also specific and particularly dissuasive. In addition to invalidating the clauses and awarding damages to the victim, the Minister for the Economy can take legal action to seek a civil fine of up to several million euros or a percentage of the offending company's turnover.
In order to better understand the mechanisms for regulating relations between companies and the penalties for unbalanced practicesOur dedicated article sheds some light on the subject.
Significant imbalance in ordinary contract law: Article 1171 of the Civil Code
The 2016 reform of contract law introduced a review of significant imbalance into the Civil Code. Article 1171 provides that "in a contract of adhesion, any non-negotiable clause, determined in advance by one of the parties, which creates a significant imbalance between the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract shall be deemed unwritten".
The scope of this text is narrower than that of special rights. It applies only to "adhesion contracts", i.e. those containing a set of non-negotiable clauses determined in advance. It contrasts with a contract by mutual agreement, the terms of which are freely negotiated. In addition, paragraph 2 of article 1171 specifies that the assessment of imbalance "does not concern either the principal subject-matter of the contract or the adequacy of the price to the performance". Control is therefore limited to ancillary clauses, those that organise the contractual relationship (liability clauses, termination clauses, penalty clauses, etc.), but not to the overall economic balance of the transaction.
The penalty is identical to that under consumer law: the clause is deemed not to have been written. This mechanism is intended to apply to all contracts of adhesion that do not fall within the scope of a special regime, for example certain contracts between private individuals or between professionals not subject to the Commercial Code.
For a more detailed analysis of this system, you can discover the application of significant imbalance to contracts of adhesion under ordinary law.
Coordination and synergies between the various forms of protection
The coexistence of these three systems raises the question of how they should be structured. Although they share a common terminology, they are not interchangeable. Consumer law offers the broadest and most structured protection for the weaker party, with its lists and abundant case law. Restrictive practices law is a powerful tool for economic regulation, with heavy penalties and public action taken by the Minister of the Economy. Ordinary law plays a subsidiary role, filling the gaps left by special laws.
The main difference lies in the intensity of control. In commercial law, the judge can examine the price, which makes it the most intrusive tool in the economic balance of the contract. In consumer law and ordinary law, this control is explicitly excluded. Similarly, the criterion of 'submission' in commercial law is more demanding to prove than the simple non-negotiability required in ordinary law. Each system therefore follows its own logic, forming a coherent whole in which protection is graduated according to the nature of the parties and the economic stakes involved.
The complexity of these mechanisms and their interactions makes contractual analysis particularly tricky. Whether you are a supplier negotiating with mass retailers, a franchisor, or simply an entrepreneur offering general terms and conditions to your customers, a poorly drafted clause can expose you to significant risks of litigation. To secure your commercial relations and prevent disputes, you need the assistance of an expert lawyer. Our firm can help you analyse, draft and negotiate your contracts. Get in touch with our team of commercial lawyers for a consultation.
Frequently asked questions
What is a significant imbalance in simple terms?
This is a situation where a contract, because it has not been freely negotiated, clearly favours one party to the detriment of the other, by creating a clear disproportion between the rights (for example, a right to terminate) and obligations (for example, the payment of penalties) of each party.
Does significant imbalance only apply to consumers?
No. While the concept originated in consumer law, it also applies to contracts between professionals (via the law on restrictive competition practices) and, more generally, to any contract of adhesion via the Civil Code.
Can the price of a contract be challenged for significant imbalance?
It depends on the context. In consumer law and ordinary contract law, the judge cannot review the price. However, in the context of practices restricting competition between professionals, a price imposed without negotiation and deemed to be unbalanced may be sanctioned.
What happens if a clause is deemed to constitute a significant imbalance?
The main sanction is that the clause is "deemed unwritten". This means that it is deleted from the contract, as if it had never existed. The rest of the contract, however, remains valid and continues to apply between the parties.
What is a membership contract?
This is a contract containing a set of clauses drafted in advance by one of the parties and which are non-negotiable. The other party has no choice but to accept the contract as a whole or to reject it. Common examples are insurance contracts or general terms and conditions of use for a website.
Do I need a lawyer to argue that there is a significant imbalance?
Demonstrating a significant imbalance requires a precise legal analysis of the clauses, the contractual context and the applicable case law. A lawyer is therefore strongly recommended to assess your chances of success and defend your rights effectively.
EN 
FR