A flexible and effective legal tool in French law, the summons is a formal act by which one person, through the intermediary of a court commissioner, enjoins another to do or not to do something, without it being a summons to appear before a court. Although often perceived as a simple prerequisite to legal action, its applications are much broader and more strategic, particularly in commercial law, where it plays a decisive role in establishing evidence, recovering debts and managing deadlines. To grasp its full significance, an analysis of the definition of summation and its fundamental principles is an illuminating starting point.
Definition and legal characteristics of the summons
A summons is defined as an extrajudicial document, meaning that it is issued outside any legal proceedings already underway. Issued by a judicial commissioner (the successor profession to the bailiff), the purpose of this document is to issue an injunction or an official summons to a person, called the summoned party, at the request of another person, the claimant. Its strength lies in its formal nature: it leaves no doubt as to the will of the petitioner and that the addressee is fully informed. The Code of Civil Procedure does not impose any strict formal requirements, which makes it highly adaptable, going well beyond the simple formal notice.
The three purposes of the summons: to compel, to prove, to challenge
Traditionally, there are three main categories of summons according to their main purpose. The first is the summons to perform, which is intended to compel the recipient to fulfil an obligation, usually to pay a sum of money. This is the best-known form of formal notice, a common synonym in non-legal language, as provided for in article 1344 of the Civil Code. The second, the summons, is a formidable weapon for obtaining evidence. Its purpose is to provoke a response or reaction from the person summoned on a specific question. The statements collected by the court commissioner can then constitute an extrajudicial confession. Finally, the rarer summons to judge is a tool that can be used to hold the State liable for denial of justice if a judge delays in ruling.
The summons in commercial law: from debt collection to protests
In commercial matters, the speed and security of transactions are essential. This is where the summons is particularly useful, whether to formalise a demand for payment or to preserve specific rights associated with commercial paper. It is a legal weapon whose practices in commercial law are multiple and strategic.
The summons to pay: more formal notice for the creditor
The summons to pay is the basic tool in the commercial debt recovery procedure. More impressive and formal than a registered letter, it sets the wheels in motion by letting the debtor know that the creditor has officially taken action. This act starts the clock ticking on late payment interest and, if unsuccessful, paves the way for more restrictive procedures such as an injunction to pay or a summons to appear before the Commercial Court. This is an almost obligatory step in demonstrating the creditor's willingness to recover the debt amicably before taking the dispute to court.
The protest: the specific summons for unpaid bills of exchange
The protest is a special and solemn form of summons, indispensable in the law of bills of exchange. Defined by the French Commercial Code, it is an authenticated document drawn up by a court commissioner or notary to officially record the non-payment of a commercial bill (bill of exchange, promissory note) or the refusal to accept a draft. It is of major importance: the drawing up of a protest in the absence of payment within the legal time limits is the imperative condition for the bearer of the bill of exchange to be able to retain his or her recourse against the previous signatories (drawer, endorsers), without which any call on the guarantee is futile. Without this act, the bearer is considered 'negligent' and loses his guarantees, with very limited exceptions. The protest is therefore much more than a mere formality; it is an essential weapon, a veritable sentinel of the payment chain in commercial law.
Probative value of the summons: the superiority of the court commissioner's document
One of the major advantages of the summons over other forms of notification is its legal value. The intervention of a public official gives it a degree of security and authority that clearly distinguishes it from, for example, a registered letter. To fully appreciate the advantages of using this document, it is useful to analyse in detail its probative value and its legal value in terms of evidence.
From extrajudicial deeds to authentic instruments
A summons issued by a court commissioner is an authentic instrument for the facts that the public officer relates in it as having been personally accomplished or observed. In practical terms, the date of the document, the delivery to the addressee (or attempted delivery) and any responses recorded by the commissioner are authentic until proven false. This means that to challenge these elements, it is not enough to provide evidence to the contrary; a complex and cumbersome legal procedure must be initiated to demonstrate that the public official has committed forgery of a public document. This maximum probative value offers unrivalled legal certainty.
Summons vs. registered letter: the weight of evidence in court
The comparison with the registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt (LRAR) is enlightening. A registered letter proves that a letter was sent on a certain date and, if the acknowledgement of receipt is signed, that it was received by the addressee. However, it in no way proves the content of the letter. A recipient acting in bad faith, your adversary, could always claim to have received an empty envelope or an unrelated document. Summonses, on the other hand, solve this problem: the court commissioner attests to the very content of the document he is serving. Its date is indisputable and its delivery is irrefutably proven, even if the addressee refuses, which is not possible with a registered letter.
The strategic impact of summonses on limitation periods
There is a widespread belief that a summons has the systematic power to interrupt limitation periods. This idea, which is common in French legal practice, is legally inaccurate and can lead to serious strategic errors, particularly in business law where control of time limits is fundamental. Understanding the precise role of the summons is therefore essential in order to interrupt or suspend limitation periods to good effect.
The principle: a summons serving formal notice does not interrupt the limitation period
Since the Act of 17 June 2008 reforming the statute of limitations in civil matters, which put an end to previous case law, formal notice, including when it takes the form of a summons to pay, is no longer a cause of interruption of the limitation period. Article 2241 of the Civil Code provides an exhaustive list of acts that interrupt prescription. The main ones are an application to court (even in summary proceedings), a precautionary measure taken in application of the Code of Civil Enforcement Procedures, or an act of forced execution. A summons to pay that merely claims a sum, without being supported by a writ of execution, is therefore not sufficient to interrupt the time limit for taking action.
The exception: a summons to pay serving as a summons to pay a writ of execution
The situation changes radically when the summons is issued on the basis of an enforceable title, such as a final judgment or a notarial deed bearing the enforcement formula. In this case, the document is no longer a simple formal notice but a summons to pay, which is the first act of enforcement. As such, by virtue of article 2244 of the Civil Code, this document, which acts as a sentinel of the creditor's rights, validly interrupts the limitation period. The distinction is therefore technical but fundamental: a summons interrupts the limitation period only when it constitutes the first step in a compulsory enforcement procedure already authorised by a title.
Advanced use cases and procedural implications
In addition to its traditional functions, the law gives the summons a key role in specific proceedings, where it becomes an indispensable tool for forcing a party to take a position or for purging third-party rights. These often technical uses illustrate the versatility of this legal instrument.
Inheritance law: summoning an heir to opt out
Article 771 of the Civil Code provides for a typical case of use: the summons to opt. When an heir (a child, a distant relative) remains silent and does not take a stand on whether to accept or renounce an inheritance, a creditor, a co-heir or the State may, after a certain period of time, summon the heir to make up his mind, to take a stand on his inheritance option. If there is no response within two months, the heir is deemed to have accepted the succession purely and simply, with all the consequences that this implies for his own estate.
Commercial law: purging liens on a business
When selling a business, the buyer must ensure that the business is not encumbered by debts secured by registrations (vendor's lien, pledge). The purging procedure, set out in the French Commercial Code, enables the business to be freed from these encumbrances. The summons plays a central role in this process. The buyer must notify the registered creditors of the sale price by deed from the court commissioner. These creditors then have a period in which to lodge an objection or make a higher bid. The summons is the act that triggers the procedure and ensures that all creditors have been formally informed.
Summons by court commissioner: procedure, costs and alternatives
The use of a summons involves a simple but formalised procedure. The claimant must give a mandate to a court commissioner, providing him with the necessary information (identity of the addressee, purpose of the summons). The cost of a summons is regulated and consists of fixed or proportional fees defined by the French Commercial Code, plus travel expenses and disbursements. Although more expensive than a registered letter, the cost must be weighed against the legal certainty and efficiency it provides. For situations where there are no major issues at stake, formal notice by registered letter, drafted in a respectful manner, remains a valid alternative, but it will never offer the same probative force or the same psychological impact as a document issued by a public official.
The summons is a legal act that is much more strategic than it seems. It can be used to formalise a claim, create irrefutable proof or trigger complex procedural mechanisms. To assess the suitability of this tool for your situation and to ensure the security of your actions, it is advisable to seek professional advice. If you are faced with an unpaid bill, a contentious situation requiring proof or a commercial procedure, do not hesitate to contact our law firm for a personalised analysis.
Sources
- Civil Code
- Commercial code
- Code of civil procedure
- Monetary and Financial Code
- Droit et pratique des procédures d'exécution, Droit.org, 2023 (ISBN 978-2-247-18920-2)
EN 
FR