Initiating legal proceedings by means of a petition is a fundamental act in civil procedure, marking the starting point of the legal process. Unlike a writ of summons, which is a document served by a court commissioner who informs the opposing party directly, the application first refers the matter to the court. However, its validity is subject to a set of strict rules on both substance and form, laid down mainly by articles 54 and 57 of the Code of Civil Procedure. A simple omission or inaccuracy can have severe consequences, ranging from the nullity of the document, a source of procedural damage, to the inadmissibility of the claim. It is therefore essential to master these formalities if you are to preserve your rights and ensure that the parties are fully informed. Drawing up a claim that complies with legal requirements and managing potential sanctions are complex acts that often require the assistance of a lawyer who is an expert in civil procedure to secure your rights and avoid any procedural irregularities.
I. Mandatory substantive requirements for civil claims
Before the actual drafting of the document is undertaken, it is essential to ensure that the substantive conditions relating to the parties themselves are met. If these requirements are not met, they constitute substantive irregularities likely to vitiate the procedure from the outset and render the document null and void, which may be raised in any event.
A. Legal standing of the parties: natural and legal persons
The first condition for taking legal action is the capacity to do so, i.e. the ability to hold rights (capacity to enjoy them) and to exercise them oneself (capacity to exercise them). While the capacity to enjoy rights is recognised for all natural persons, it is limited for legal persons by their statutory speciality. Capacity to exercise rights, which is a principle for adults, does not apply to unemancipated minors or adults under guardianship, who must be represented in order to act.
A lack of capacity is sanctioned by the substantive nullity of the document. For example, an application lodged in the name of a deceased person or on behalf of an entity without legal personality, such as a joint venture, is null and void. The case law of the Cour de cassation has specified that this nullity on the grounds of substantive irregularity cannot be covered by a subsequent regularisation, for example by the intervention of the heirs (Civ. 2e, 4 March 2021, no. 19-22.829). Before analysing these conditions of validity in detail, it is essential to understand the very nature of the application and to distinguish it from other initiating documents such as the writ of summons, by exploring the different types of request provided for in the Code of Civil Procedure.
B. Power of attorney and representation in the proceedings (Ad Litem)
When a party does not have the capacity to act or chooses not to act personally, he must be represented. A distinction must be made between representation in the action (ad agendum), which is the power to initiate proceedings on behalf of another person, and representation in the proceedings (ad litem), which is the mandate given to a professional to carry out the acts of the proceedings.
In many proceedings, particularly before the judicial court when representation is compulsory, the lawyer must comply with the rules on postulation, which limit his or her jurisdiction to a defined territorial area. Failure to comply with this principle is punishable by substantive nullity. The lawyer's mandate to represent the client, known as the "ad litem" mandate, is presumed: he does not have to prove that he has written authority from his client for routine acts, but his role as adviser remains essential. However, for the most serious acts, such as withdrawing an action, a special power of attorney is required.
II. Formal requirements for the application: format and compulsory information
In addition to the substantive requirements, the validity of an application depends on compliance with a precise set of formalities. These requirements, which relate to the format, content and transmission to the court registry, are designed to ensure that the judge and the opposing party are clearly informed. Failure to comply with them is generally punished by invalidity on formal grounds.
A. The medium of the request: paper, digital and electronic signature
The application may be drawn up on plain paper or using Cerfa forms, each official model of which is available online. Increasingly, the procedure is becoming paperless, making it possible to bring a case before certain courts electronically via the "Portail du justiciable" on Justice.fr, an online public service. This involves the use of an electronic signature, the reliability of which is essential.
By law, an electronic signature has the same value as a handwritten signature, provided it is based on a reliable identification process. A qualified electronic signature that complies with the European eIDAS regulation is presumed to be reliable. If the signature does not comply, it is not automatically null and void. The Court of Cassation has ruled that an irregularity in an electronic signature constitutes a formal defect: nullity is only incurred if the opposing party proves that the irregularity caused it prejudice, which is rare if the plaintiff is clearly identified (Civ. 1re, 23 Sept. 2020, no. 19-12.829).
B. General mandatory information (Articles 54 and 57 CPC)
The core of the formalism of the application lies in the information required by articles 54 and 57 of the Code of Civil Procedure, on pain of nullity. The application must indicate :
- The court seised : its nature and location.
- Full identification of the parties : for a natural person (surname, forenames, profession, place of residence, nationality, date and place of birth) and for a legal entity (form, name, registered office and legal representative body), so that their identity is unequivocal.
- Purpose of the request : a statement, even a summary statement, of claims.
- Supporting documents : a useful list of the documents on which the application is based, often in the form of a schedule.
- Attempting to reach an amicable settlement : for disputes not exceeding €5,000 or certain neighbourhood disputes falling within the remit of the Protection Litigation Judge (JCP), it is compulsory, on pain of inadmissibility, to mention the amicable steps taken (mediation, conciliation) before bringing the case before the judge.
- Date and signature : the application must be dated and signed by the applicant or his authorised representative.
Failure to include any of these details may result in the deed being declared null and void, but only if the opposing party can show that it has been prejudiced by the error. Compliance with these compulsory details is the first step in obtaining an enforceable title, which can then be used to initiate compulsory enforcement measures. It is therefore crucial to master the following beforehand the fundamental principles of seizure.
C. Specific information depending on the nature of the application (unilateral or joint)
Civil procedure distinguishes between a unilateral application, the most common method of bringing an action where the plaintiff acts without informing his opponent in advance, and a joint application. In the case of a unilateral application, which differs from a writ of summons in that the opposing party is not informed in advance, the precise identification of the defendant is mandatory to enable the court registry to summon him.
The application is said to be joint when it is presented by mutual agreement between the parties. The parties agree to submit their dispute to a judge but disagree on the solution. The document must set out their respective claims, the points on which they disagree and their arguments. It may also contain specific clauses, such as an agreement to waive the right to appeal or an agreement for the judge to rule as amiable compositeur (in equity) and limit the debate.
D. Forwarding the application to the court registry
The application may be sent to the clerk's office of the relevant court by hand, by post (in which case the application is sent to the clerk's office) or electronically. It is the date of receipt by the court registry that legally marks the referral of the case to the court. From that point onwards, the judge is officially in charge of the case. The court registry registers the case in the general register, thus opening the file, and, in the case of a unilateral application, sends the defendant a summons to attend the hearing.
III. Penalties for irregularities in the application and possibilities for rectifying them
Failure to comply with the conditions governing the validity of an application is not always fatal. The Code of Civil Procedure sets out a system of graduated sanctions and offers possibilities for "rescuing" the document, so as to avoid excessively penalising the litigant for a simple formal error.
A. Distinction between nullity on grounds of formal defect and substantive defect
Procedural law makes a crucial distinction. Invalidity on the grounds of formal defect is a sanction for failure to comply with a rule governing the presentation of a document. In order to be declared null and void, it must be provided for in a statute, the opposing party must prove a prejudice (a 'grievance'), and it must be raised before any defence on the merits. This requirement of a grievance, which has been clarified by abundant case law, considerably limits annulments for minor errors. The distinction between formal defects and substantive irregularities is not merely a legal subtlety; it is a fundamental element of debtor protectionThis is particularly true in the case of consumer credit, which can thus raise nullities to defend itself against an incorrectly formulated claim.
A substantive irregularity is much more serious, as it affects the essential conditions of the action (lack of capacity or power). It is dealt with more strictly: it can be raised at any stage of the proceedings and does not require proof of a grievance. Nullity on the grounds of a formal defect or a substantive irregularity can have serious consequences, not only for the proceedings in progress but also for the ability to initiate a seizure of property at a later date, where the consequences of a procedural error can be just as damaging.
B. The regularisation of vitiated applications and its limits
The guiding principle of the procedure is that nullity must be avoided. Article 121 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that a nullity shall not be declared if the cause of the nullity has disappeared by the time the court makes its ruling. An act that was initially vitiated can therefore be "regularised". For example, the omission of a mandatory statement in the application may be corrected in subsequent pleadings.
However, there are limits to this power. Certain substantive irregularities, such as an action in the name of a non-existent legal entity, cannot be rectified. What's more, since the 2008 reform of the statute of limitations, it has been much easier to regularise a defect of form. The current version of this text, and in particular article 2241 of the Civil Code, provides that a legal action interrupts the limitation period even if the act of bringing the action is annulled on the grounds of a procedural defect. This means that the time limit for bringing an action does not continue to run, giving the plaintiff time to correct his act without risking foreclosure. However, a more radical sanction such as inadmissibility (for example, for failure to attempt to reach an amicable settlement) cannot generally be remedied and the claimant loses the benefit of the interruption of the limitation period.
IV. The procedural and substantive effects of filing a petition
Filing a valid application at the registry triggers a series of important legal effects, which affect both the conduct of the proceedings and the parties' rights on the merits.
A. Institution of proceedings and bringing the case before the court
The first effect of the application is to initiate proceedings, thereby creating the "legal procedural link" between the parties and the court. At the same time, submission of the application to the court registry marks taking a case to court Depending on the subject matter and the stage of the dispute, this may be the judge dealing with the merits of the case, the enforcement judge, whose powers it is crucial to understand, or even the president of the court in specific cases such as an order on application. The judge is then given the task of settling the dispute.
B. Interruption of limitation and foreclosure periods
This is one of the major effects of a legal action, as distinct from a simple summary proceedings summons, which may have different effects. According to article 2241 of the Civil Code, bringing an action before a court interrupts the limitation period. One of the major effects of the application is theinterruption of limitation periodsThis is a key mechanism that sets the record straight and preserves the claimant's rights for the duration of the proceedings. This effect occurs even if the court seised lacks jurisdiction or if the act is subsequently annulled for a procedural defect, a solution repeatedly confirmed by case law. It should be noted, however, that certain applications, such as an application for an investigative measure before any trial (art. 145 CPC) or an application for an order for payment, do not have this interruptive effect.
C. Other effects on the substance of the law
The application also has an effect on substantive law. It serves as formal notice for the defendant, causing default interest to accrue on a sum of money. In the case of an obligation to deliver something certain, it transfers the risks of the thing to the debtor. Finally, for a person who holds property in good faith and is ordered to return it, the obligation to return the fruits (for example, the rent on a building under a lease) only runs from the date of the court action.
The validity of an application in civil procedure is an issue that determines access to the courts and the effectiveness of rights. Between the substantive requirements and the practical formalities of articles 54 and 57 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the drafting of this document leaves no room for improvisation. The assistance of a lawyer who is an expert in civil procedure is often crucial to ensuring that you can proceed with confidence. Our firm is at your disposal to analyse your situation and assist you.
Sources
- Code of Civil Procedure, in particular articles 54, 57, 112 to 121
- Civil Code, in particular articles 1344, 2241 and 2243
- Court of Cassation case law (in particular Civ. 2e, 4 March 2021, no. 19-22.829; Civ. 1re, 23 Sept. 2020, no. 19-12.894)
- Decrees and regulations published in the Journal Officiel (OJ)
EN 
FR