Civil procedure

  • yellow liquid
  • The limits of res judicata: when can a decision be challenged and when does it not apply?

    By Raphaël MORENON
    12 April 2025
    In our previous articles, we established that the principle of res judicata is a powerful rule: a case that has been decided cannot be tried again (autorité de la chose jugée) and a decision becomes irrevocable, i.e. 'final', once all appeals have been exhausted. This rule ensures stability and legal certainty. However, as is often the case in law, this principle is not an impenetrable wall. Exceptions exist, nuances apply, and not all court decisions have the same scope. You may be asking yourself: are there situations in which a decision, even an apparently final one, can be reviewed? Are some decisions less 'powerful' than others? How do decisions handed down by different types of court interact, for example between criminal and civil law? This article explores the limits of res judicata, those cases where the intangibility of a decision is subject to exceptions or temperaments. Not all decisions are res judicata.
en_GBEN