Receiving a letter from a debt collection agency can be a source of considerable stress. Calling in a debt collection agency is common practice for creditors, but these letters, which are often designed to intimidate with phrases such as "LAST NOTICE BEFORE SEIZURE", can cause anxiety. However, it is essential to be aware of the legal reality, which is far removed from the pressure being exerted. These commercial companies, often referred to as collection agencies, have almost no legal enforcement powers. The aim of this article is to demystify their role, detail the very strict legal framework governing their activity and give you the keys to understanding the debt collection process so that you can react calmly and effectively. We will cover the various aspects of this issue, which are dealt with in more detail in our dedicated articles.
Collection agencies and bailiffs: a fundamental distinction
The first source of confusion, often fostered by the collection companies themselves, concerns their status. It is essential not to confuse a debt collection agency, which is simply a commercial enterprise, with a bailiff (now a judicial commissioner), who fulfils a public service mission.
The judicial officer is a public and ministerial officer. Appointed by the Keeper of the Seals, he is the only professional empowered by law to enforce a debt. In other words, they can implement binding measures on the basis of a court decision (an enforcement order).
In contrast, a company specialising in debt collection acts as a mere agent on behalf of a creditor (its customer). Its mission is strictly limited to amicable debt collection. Consequently, a debt collection company can never :
- Seize your assets or your bank account.
- Attach your wages.
- Enter your home or workplace without your explicit consent.
- Legally compel you to pay.
Their only power is to try to persuade you to pay the amount due. Their action is based entirely on your consent and has no binding effect. Without a court order, their threats have no legal force.
The strict framework of amicable debt collection
The activity of amicable debt collection is strictly regulated by the Code of Civil Enforcement Procedure. Any company wishing to engage in this activity must comply with specific obligations to protect the debtor, who is often a consumer.
The collection company's obligations
To operate legally, a debt collection company must meet a number of conditions, or face penalties. It must take out professional indemnity insurance and have a bank account dedicated exclusively to receiving funds on behalf of its customers. In addition, they must have signed a written agreement with the creditor (their customer) giving them authority to act. This agreement must detail the basis and amount of the debt to be recovered, as well as the terms and conditions of the agent's remuneration.
The formal notice letter: formalities to be complied with
The first official step is to send a letter of formal notice. This letter is not a trivial act and must contain precise information via the compulsory details listed in article R. 124-4 of the Code of Civil Enforcement Procedures:
- The name of the collection company and its registered office.
- The identity of the creditor (the person or company to whom the money is owed).
- The basis and detailed total amount of the debt (principal, interest, etc.).
- Indication that you have to pay the amount due and the payment terms for repaying the debt.
- The exact reproduction of two paragraphs of article L. 111-8 of the same code, specifying that the costs of out-of-court collection are to be borne by the creditor, a vital piece of information to avoid paying more than the principal.
If any of these details are missing, the formal notice will not be valid. It is therefore essential to carefully check the content of any letter you receive.
Identifying and countering abusive and illegal practices
Unfortunately, some companies do not hesitate to use a deceptive and aggressive method or practice that flirts with illegality, to put pressure on the debtor and get him to pay without thinking, feeling victimised by the situation.
Telephone harassment and psychological pressure
One common practice is to make reminders by telephone. Although a telephone call is not illegal, its insistent repetition and threatening tone may constitute an offence of telephone harassment, punishable under the Criminal Code (see for example article 222-16). The law protects your privacy: calls are not permitted at unsociable hours (early mornings, late evenings, weekends or public holidays). Any psychological pressure, veiled threat or disclosure of your financial situation to a third party is an abusive practice. If you find that you are not complying with the regulations in force, you can report it to the Direction générale de la Concurrence, de la Consommation et de la Répression des Fraudes (DGCCRF), which may launch an investigation.
Charging illegal fees to the debtor
There is one key point to bear in mind: collection costs incurred without a writ of execution remain the sole responsibility of the creditor. This is clearly stated in article L. 111-8 of the Code of Civil Enforcement Procedures, a principle that is also reiterated in the Consumer Code. The case law of the Cour de cassation, particularly its civil division, is consistent on this point. A debt collection company therefore has no right to charge you "handling fees", "reminder fees" or any other sum in addition to the initial debt. If a letter mentions such fees, you are under no obligation to pay them. Attempting to do so is illegal.
How do you respond to a payment request?
When faced with a letter or call, don't give in to panic or pressure. Adopt a methodical approach to defending your rights. The absence of a response from you under no circumstances authorises a seizure.
Check the debt and the limitation period
The first thing to do is not to pay anything in a hurry. Make contact in writing (registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt for easy proof) to request all the evidence of the debt: a copy of the initial contract, the unpaid invoice, etc. The company must be able to prove that the debt exists and that the amount is correct. The company must be able to prove that the debt exists and that the amount is correct. You should also check the limitation period. In France, many debts are extinguished after a certain period of time. For example, the period is 2 years for a consumer debt (credit, unpaid telephone bill) and 5 years for most civil and commercial debts.
Dispute or negotiate: your options
If you believe that the debt is not due or that the amount claimed is incorrect, formally dispute it by registered letter. The creditor will then have to decide whether to take legal action, which represents a cost and a risk for him. If you recognise the debt but your financial situation is difficult, don't hesitate to propose a payment schedule or extension. An amicable solution is often possible, and it is best to avoid worsening the situation by filing for overindebtedness. To assess your situation and put the best strategy in place, it's a good idea to consult a lawyer. The assistance of a lawyer with expertise in debt collection can prove decisive. You can also obtain free information from legal access points.
When the threat becomes real: the transition to judicial collection
The situation changes radically if the creditor decides to take legal action. If amicable debt collection fails, the creditor can seek to obtain a judgment, and therefore an enforceable title. This is a court decision (a judgement or an injunction to pay) issued by a judge, which officially recognises the existence of the debt and orders the debtor to pay it. It is only once the creditor is in possession of this writ of execution that he can instruct a bailiff, either via his debt collection service or directly, to proceed with enforced debt collection (seizure of accounts, wages, etc.). The transition from an amicable procedure to legal proceedings is never automatic. It represents an economic risk and a costly and uncertain approach for the creditor, who will hesitate to take legal action against you, especially for a modest sum.
As you can see, the power of a debt collection agency is limited to persuasion. If you are faced with this type of situation, stay calm, check your rights and don't hesitate to seek legal advice. For a personal analysis of your case and tailored support, contact our law firm.
Frequently asked questions
What real power does a collection company have?
A debt collection agency has very limited power. It can only try to persuade you to pay amicably by means of letters or calls. It has no legal powers of coercion, such as seizure, without a court order.
Can a debt collection agency seize my bank account?
No, absolutely not. Only a judicial commissioner (formerly a bailiff), acting on the basis of a writ of execution obtained in court, can seize your bank account.
Do I have to pay the "collection costs" added to my bill?
No. Attempting to charge you for them is illegal. In the case of amicable debt collection, the law (article L. 111-8 of the Code of Civil Enforcement Procedures) stipulates that the costs are to be borne exclusively by the creditor. You only have to pay the initial amount of the debt.
What if the debt claimed is very old?
Check the limitation period. For a telephone bill or consumer credit, this is 2 years. If this period is exceeded, the debt is extinguished and you are no longer obliged to pay it. However, any payment, even a partial payment, may restart the period. If the debt is owed but your situation is complex, an over-indebtedness procedure may be a solution to consider.
What is the difference between a formal notice and an injunction to pay?
A formal notice is a simple letter, even sent by recorded delivery, asking you to pay. An injunction to pay is a real court order issued by a judge, a key stage in the legal recovery procedure, which has binding force and can lead to compulsory enforcement.
Are repeated phone calls from a debt collection agency legal?
No, if they are malicious or repeated with the aim of intimidating you, they can be classified as telephone harassment, an offence punishable under the Criminal Code. What's more, the calls must not infringe on your privacy (late hours, weekends).
EN 
FR